Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2016
Transanal endoscopic surgery for complications of prior rectal surgery.
Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- A fully transanal endoscopic approach for large post-anastomotic high rectovaginal fistulas: An IDEAL stage 1 technical note.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026Article
- Treatment of Rectovaginal Fistula.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2023Review
- Minimally invasive endoscopic repair of rectovaginal fistula.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2022Article
- Randomized experimental study of two novel techniques for transanal repair of dehiscent low rectal anastomosis.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Rectovaginal fistula after low anterior resection: Prevention and management.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2021Review
- Novel technique for anastomotic salvage using transanal minimally invasive surgery: A case report.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2019Article
- Management of colorectal anastomotic stricture with transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM).Techniques in coloproctology · 2018Article
- St.Gallen consensus on safe implementation of transanal total mesorectal excision.Surgical endoscopy · 2018Article
- Redo transanal total mesorectal excision (Re-TaTME) after initial TaTME; is it possible?AME case reports · 2018Article
- Utilization of the TAMIS technique for trans-stomal excision of a colonic neoplasm: a video demonstration.Techniques in coloproctology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLong-term complications of previous rectal surgery (e.g., enterovisceral fistula, anastomotic stricture, rectal stenosis) can be challenging problems for which transabdominal or transperineal surgery with or without definitive fecal diversion is often required. Transanal endoscopic surgery (TES) might allow for local treatment of these complications, thereby saving patients from otherwise major surgery. PATIENTS AND
methodsAll patients undergoing TES in the IJsselland Hospital (NL) since 1996 were recorded in a prospective database, of which twenty patients were treated for complications after previous rectal surgery. Data on prior treatment, surgical techniques, outcomes, and need for additional surgery were collected.
resultsTwenty patients were identified from the database (rectourinary fistula n = 3, rectovaginal fistula n = 5, anastomotic stricture n = 8, and rectal stenosis n = 4). One of the three (33 %) rectourinary fistulas and two of five (40 %) rectovaginal fistulas were successfully treated with TES. Anastomotic strictures were successfully treated in 5/8 (63 %) patients. Strictures after local excision of rectal tumors were successfully treated in 3/4 (75 %) patients. No minor complication and one major complication occurred (rectovaginal fistula after stenoplasty eventually requiring Hartmann's procedure).
conclusionsTransanal treatment of anastomotic strictures, rectal stenosis, and fistula after prior rectal surgery is safe and effective in a large proportion of patients. TES should be considered as a first step in all patients presenting with these late complications after rectal surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.