Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27059974›Full record

Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2016

Transanal endoscopic surgery for complications of prior rectal surgery.

Mark G van Vledder, Pascal G Doornebosch, Eelco J R de Graaf

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A fully transanal endoscopic approach for large post-anastomotic high rectovaginal fistulas: An IDEAL stage 1 technical note.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026
    Article
  2. Treatment of Rectovaginal Fistula.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2023
    Review
  3. Minimally invasive endoscopic repair of rectovaginal fistula.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark G van VledderDepartment of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Prins Constantijnweg 2, PO 690, 2900 AR, Capelle Ad IJssel, The Netherlands.
Pascal G DoorneboschDepartment of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Prins Constantijnweg 2, PO 690, 2900 AR, Capelle Ad IJssel, The Netherlands.
Eelco J R de GraafDepartment of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Prins Constantijnweg 2, PO 690, 2900 AR, Capelle Ad IJssel, The Netherlands. edegraaf@ysl.nl.
IJsselland Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong-term complications of previous rectal surgery (e.g., enterovisceral fistula, anastomotic stricture, rectal stenosis) can be challenging problems for which transabdominal or transperineal surgery with or without definitive fecal diversion is often required. Transanal endoscopic surgery (TES) might allow for local treatment of these complications, thereby saving patients from otherwise major surgery. PATIENTS AND

methodsAll patients undergoing TES in the IJsselland Hospital (NL) since 1996 were recorded in a prospective database, of which twenty patients were treated for complications after previous rectal surgery. Data on prior treatment, surgical techniques, outcomes, and need for additional surgery were collected.

resultsTwenty patients were identified from the database (rectourinary fistula n = 3, rectovaginal fistula n = 5, anastomotic stricture n = 8, and rectal stenosis n = 4). One of the three (33 %) rectourinary fistulas and two of five (40 %) rectovaginal fistulas were successfully treated with TES. Anastomotic strictures were successfully treated in 5/8 (63 %) patients. Strictures after local excision of rectal tumors were successfully treated in 3/4 (75 %) patients. No minor complication and one major complication occurred (rectovaginal fistula after stenoplasty eventually requiring Hartmann's procedure).

conclusionsTransanal treatment of anastomotic strictures, rectal stenosis, and fistula after prior rectal surgery is safe and effective in a large proportion of patients. TES should be considered as a first step in all patients presenting with these late complications after rectal surgery.

Indexed as

Transanal Endoscopic SurgeryAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRectal DiseasesRectumTreatment OutcomeAnastomotic strictureComplicationsRectal stenosisRectal surgeryRectourinary fistulaRectovaginal fistulaTransanal endoscopic surgery

Identifiers

PMID27059974
OpenAlexW2330702927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.