Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27059972›Full record

Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2016

Long-term assessment of parastomal hernia prevention by intra-peritoneal mesh reinforcement according to the modified Sugarbaker technique.

Philippe Hauters, Jean-Luc Cardin, Marc Lepere, Alain Valverde, Jean-Pierre Cossa, Sylvain Auvray, Dominique Framery, Constantin Zaranis

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Prophylactic Mesh in Parastomal Hernia Prevention: Current Evidence.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Philippe HautersCHwapi, Site Notre-Dame, 9 Avenue Delmée, 7500, Tournai, Belgium. ph.hauters@bipweb.be.
Jean-Luc CardinPolyclinique du Maine, 4 Avenue des Français Libres, 5310, Laval, France.
Marc LepereClinique Saint-Charles, 11 Bld René Levesque, 8500, La Roche Sur Yon, France.
Alain ValverdeGrand Hôpital Diaconesses, 125 Rue d'Avron, 75020, Paris, France.
Jean-Pierre CossaClinique Bizet, 23 Rue Georges Bizet, 75116, Paris, France.
Sylvain AuvrayCHP Saint-Martin, 18 Rue des Roquemonts, 14050, Caen, France.
Dominique FrameryC.M.C. de la Baie de Morlaix, 29600, Morlaix, France.
Constantin ZaranisClinique du Mail, 96, Allée du Mail, 17000, La Rochelle, France.
Centre Hospitalier des Pays de Morlaix · FRCentre Hospitalier de Wallonie Picarde · BEHôpital des Diaconesses · FRLaboratoire Saint Martin · FRRoche (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParastomal hernia (PSH) is a very frequent complication after creation of a permanent colostomy. The aim of that study is to assess the safety and the long-term efficacy of an intra-peritoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) positioned at the time of primary stoma formation to prevent PSH occurrence. MATERIALS AND

methodsThat multicentre prospective study concerned 29 consecutive patients operated for cancer of the low rectum between 2008 and 2014. There were 14 men and 15 women with a median age of 73 years (range 39-88) and a BMI of 28 (range 21-43). All the patients had potentially curative abdominoperineal excision associated with IPOM reinforcement of the abdominal wall with a round non-slit composite mesh centred on the stoma site and covering the lateralized colon according to the modified Sugarbaker technique. The major outcomes analysed were operative time, complications related to mesh and PSH incidence. Patients were evaluated at 6-month intervals for the first 2 years and thereafter annually with physical examination and CT scan control. For PSH evaluation, we used the classification of Moreno-Matias.

resultsSurgery was performed by laparoscopy in 24 patients and by laparotomy in 5; 17 had a trans-peritoneal colostomy and 12 an extra-peritoneal colostomy. The median size of the mesh was 15 cm (range 12-20), the operative time 225 min. (range 123-311) and the specific time for mesh placement 15 min. (range 10-30). With a median follow-up of 48 months (range 6-88), no mesh infection or complication requiring mesh removal were recorded. No patient developed a true PSH; two of them had a type Ia PSH (only containing the bowel forming the colostomy with a sac < 5 cm) and were totally asymptomatic.

conclusionIn our series, the incidence of PSH was 7 % and no specific mesh-related complication was noted. Prophylactic mesh reinforcement according to the modified Sugarbaker is an effective technique that addresses the issues related to the occurrence of PSH.

Indexed as

Surgical MeshAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Squamous CellColostomyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsHernia, VentralHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPeritoneumIntra-peritoneal only meshModified Sugarbaker techniqueParastomal herniaPreventionProphylactic mesh

Identifiers

PMID27059972
OpenAlexW2319417737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.