Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27059793›Full record

GuidelineIntensive care medicine2016

Guidelines for the withdrawal of life-sustaining measures.

James Downar, Jesse W Delaney, Laura Hawryluck, Lisa Kenny

Abstract readPractice Guideline
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in Intensive care medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Canadian Guidelines for Controlled Pediatric Donation After Circulatory Determination of Death-Summary Report.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2017
    Guideline
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Palliative medicine · 2026
    Article
  12. Healthcare utilization and end-of-life care based on life-sustaining treatment decisions in patients with cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Navigating the gift of life: demystifying the organ donation and transplantation pathway in Canada.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2025
    Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

James DownarDivisions of Critical Care Medicine and Palliative Care, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. james.downar@utoronto.ca.
Jesse W DelaneyRouge Valley Health System, Toronto, Canada.
Laura HawryluckDivision of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Lisa KennyFaculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWithdrawal of life-sustaining measures is a common event in the intensive care unit yet it involves a complex balance of medical, legal and ethical considerations. Very few healthcare providers have been specifically trained to withdraw life-sustaining measures, and no comprehensive guidelines exist to help ensure clinicians deliver the highest quality of care to patients and families. Hence, we sought to develop guidelines for the process of withdrawing life-sustaining measures in the clinical setting.

methodsWe convened an interdisciplinary group of ICU care providers from the Canadian Critical Care Society and the Canadian Association of Critical Care Nurses, and used a modified Delphi process to answer key clinical and ethical questions identified in the literature.

resultsA total of 39 experienced clinicians completed the initial workshop, and 36 were involved in the subsequent Delphi rounds. The group developed a series of guidelines to address (1) preparing for withdrawal of life-sustaining measures; (2) assessment of distress; (3) pharmaceutical management of distress; and (4) discontinuation of life-sustaining measures and monitoring. The group achieved consensus on all aspects of the guidelines after the third Delphi round.

conclusionWe present these guidelines to help physicians provide high-quality end of life (EOL) care in the ICU. Future studies should address their effectiveness from both critical care team and family perspectives.

Indexed as

Euthanasia, PassiveCanadaDecision MakingDelphi TechniqueFamilyGriefHumansInterprofessional RelationsLife Support CarePain MeasurementPalliative CarePatient ComfortPsychomotor AgitationRespiratory InsufficiencyTerminal CareConsensusCritical careDelphi techniqueLife support carePalliative careStandardsTerminal care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.