ArticleJournal of medical systems2016
Confidentiality Protection of Digital Health Records in Cloud Computing.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital health records: an essential yet neglected step in Iraq.Oxford open digital health · 2025Article
- Blockchain-Modeled Edge-Computing-Based Smart Home Monitoring System with Energy Usage Prediction.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Novel Image Processing Approach to Enhancement and Compression of X-ray Images.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- A Review of Intelligent Driving Pedestrian Detection Based on Deep Learning.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2021Review
- Optimization of Tumor Disease Monitoring in Medical Big Data Environment Based on High-Order Simulated Annealing Neural Network Algorithm.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2021Article
- Helping clinicians and patients navigate electronic patient portals: ethical and legal principles.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electronic medical records containing confidential information were uploaded to the cloud. The cloud allows medical crews to access and manage the data and integration of medical records easily. This data system provides relevant information to medical personnel and facilitates and improve electronic medical record management and data transmission. A structure of cloud-based and patient-centered personal health record (PHR) is proposed in this study. This technique helps patients to manage their health information, such as appointment date with doctor, health reports, and a completed understanding of their own health conditions. It will create patients a positive attitudes to maintain the health. The patients make decision on their own for those whom has access to their records over a specific span of time specified by the patients. Storing data in the cloud environment can reduce costs and enhance the share of information, but the potential threat of information security should be taken into consideration. This study is proposing the cloud-based secure transmission mechanism is suitable for multiple users (like nurse aides, patients, and family members).
Indexed as
Identifiers
27059737What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.