Trial reportBMC cancer2016
Advance care planning--a multi-centre cluster randomised clinical trial: the research protocol of the ACTION study.
Trial report in BMC cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03609658 (Integrated Approach to Patient and Family Engagement for Advance Care Planning for Vulnerable Older Adult Within an Accountable Care Organization), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Integrated Approach to Patient and Family Engagement for Advance Care Planning for Vulnerable Older Adult Within an Accountable Care Organization (ACO)
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- Healthcare use and healthcare costs for patients with advanced cancer; the international ACTION cluster-randomised trial on advance care planning.Palliative medicine · 2023Trial
- Missing not at random in end of life care studies: multiple imputation and sensitivity analysis on data from the ACTION study.BMC medical research methodology · 2021Trial
- Advance care planning in patients with advanced cancer: A 6-country, cluster-randomised clinical trial.PLoS medicine · 2020Trial
- Exploratory analyses of the Danish Palliative Care Trial (DanPaCT): a randomized trial of early specialized palliative care plus standard care versus standard care in advanced cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Advance care planning in patients with incurable cancer: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.BMJ open · 2016Trial
- Advance care planning in the last year of life of patients with advanced cancer: patients' perspectives on decision-making and their family and physicians' awareness of future care preferences.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Review
- Article
- A Joanna Briggs Institute Framework Approach to Shared Decision Making in End-of-Life.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Review
- Self-efficacy of advanced cancer patients for participation in treatment-related decision-making in six European countries: the ACTION study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023Article
- How can advance care planning support hope in patients with advanced cancer and their families: A qualitative study as part of the international ACTION trial.European journal of cancer care · 2022Article
- Article
- The development and feasibility study of Multidisciplinary Timely Undertaken Advance Care Planning conversations at the outpatient clinic: the MUTUAL intervention.BMC palliative care · 2022Article
- Neuro-oncology and supportive care: the role of the neurologist.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022Review
- Article
- Functional impairment, symptom severity, and overall quality of life in patients with advanced lung or colorectal cancer in six European countries: baseline findings from the ACTION study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021Article
- Factors associated with concordance between POLST orders and current treatment preferences.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2021Article
- Perceptions of involvement in advance care planning and emotional functioning in patients with advanced cancer.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2021Observational
- Do Life-sustaining Treatment Orders Match Patient and Surrogate Preferences? The Role of POLST.Journal of general internal medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAwareness of preferences regarding medical care should be a central component of the care of patients with advanced cancer. Open communication can facilitate this but can occur in an ad hoc or variable manner. Advance care planning (ACP) is a formalized process of communication between patients, relatives and professional caregivers about patients' values and care preferences. It raises awareness of the need to anticipate possible future deterioration of health. ACP has the potential to improve current and future healthcare decision-making, provide patients with a sense of control, and improve their quality of life. METHODS/
designWe will study the effects of the ACP program Respecting Choices on the quality of life of patients with advanced lung or colorectal cancer. In a phase III multicenter cluster randomised controlled trial, 22 hospitals in 6 countries will be randomised. In the intervention sites, patients will be offered interviews with a trained facilitator. In the control sites, patients will receive care as usual. In total, 1360 patients will be included. All participating patients will be asked to complete questionnaires at inclusion, and again after 2.5 and 4.5 months. If a patient dies within a year after inclusion, a relative will be asked to complete a questionnaire on end-of-life care. Use of medical care will be assessed by checking medical files. The primary endpoint is patients' quality of life at 2.5 months post-inclusion. Secondary endpoints are the extent to which care as received is aligned with patients' preferences, patients' evaluation of decision-making processes, quality of end-of-life care and cost-effectiveness of the intervention. A complementary qualitative study will be carried out to explore the lived experience of engagement with the Respecting Choices program from the perspectives of patients, their Personal Representatives, healthcare providers and facilitators. DISCUSSION: Transferring the concept of ACP from care of the elderly to patients with advanced cancer, who on average are younger and retain their mental capacity for a larger part of their disease trajectory, is an important next step in an era of increased focus on patient centered healthcare and shared decision-making.
trial registrationInternational Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number: ISRCTN63110516. Date of registration: 10/3/2014.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.