Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27059593›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2016

Advance care planning--a multi-centre cluster randomised clinical trial: the research protocol of the ACTION study.

Judith A C Rietjens, Ida J Korfage, Lesley Dunleavy, Nancy J Preston, Lea J Jabbarian, Caroline Arnfeldt Christensen, Maja de Brito, Francesco Bulli, Glenys Caswell, Branka Červ and 22 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03609658 (Integrated Approach to Patient and Family Engagement for Advance Care Planning for Vulnerable Older Adult Within an Accountable Care Organization), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03609658 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Integrated Approach to Patient and Family Engagement for Advance Care Planning for Vulnerable Older Adult Within an Accountable Care Organization (ACO)

TypeinterventionalSponsorWake Forest University Health SciencesRan2018 to 2019Enrolled146ConditionsAdvance Care PlanningArmsNurse Navigator Pathway, Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. A Joanna Briggs Institute Framework Approach to Shared Decision Making in End-of-Life.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Review
  11. Self-efficacy of advanced cancer patients for participation in treatment-related decision-making in six European countries: the ACTION study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Neuro-oncology and supportive care: the role of the neurologist.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors.

Judith A C RietjensDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. j.rietjens@erasmusmc.nl.
Ida J KorfageDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Lesley DunleavyInternational Observatory on the End-of-Life Care, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YG, UK.
Nancy J PrestonInternational Observatory on the End-of-Life Care, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YG, UK.
Lea J JabbarianDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Caroline Arnfeldt ChristensenDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014, København, Denmark.
Maja de BritoUniversity Clinic for Respiratory and Allergic Diseases Golnik, Golnik, Slovenia.
Francesco BulliClinical and Descriptive Epidemiology Unit, ISPO Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, Florence, Italy.
Glenys CaswellSchool of Health Sciences, Sue Ryder Centre for the Study of Supportive, Palliative and End of Life Care, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Branka ČervUniversity Clinic for Respiratory and Allergic Diseases Golnik, Golnik, Slovenia.
Johannes van DeldenJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Medical School of Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Luc DeliensEnd-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium.
Giuseppe GoriniClinical and Descriptive Epidemiology Unit, ISPO Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, Florence, Italy.
Mogens GroenvoldDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014, København, Denmark.
Dirk HouttekierEnd-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium.
Francesca IngravalloDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Marijke C KarsJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Medical School of Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Urška LunderUniversity Clinic for Respiratory and Allergic Diseases Golnik, Golnik, Slovenia.
Guido MiccinesiClinical and Descriptive Epidemiology Unit, ISPO Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, Florence, Italy.
Alenka MimićUniversity Clinic for Respiratory and Allergic Diseases Golnik, Golnik, Slovenia.
Eugenio PaciClinical and Descriptive Epidemiology Unit, ISPO Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, Florence, Italy.
Sheila PayneInternational Observatory on the End-of-Life Care, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YG, UK.
Suzanne PolinderDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Kristian PollockSchool of Health Sciences, Sue Ryder Centre for the Study of Supportive, Palliative and End of Life Care, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Jane SeymourSchool of Health Sciences, Sue Ryder Centre for the Study of Supportive, Palliative and End of Life Care, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Anja SimoničUniversity Clinic for Respiratory and Allergic Diseases Golnik, Golnik, Slovenia.
Anna Thit JohnsenThe Research Unit, Department of Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg / Frederiksberg Hospital, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400, København, NV, Denmark.
Mariëtte N VerkissenEnd-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium.
Esther de VriesDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Andrew WilcockSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Marieke ZwakmanJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Medical School of Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Agnes van der Heide PlDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAwareness of preferences regarding medical care should be a central component of the care of patients with advanced cancer. Open communication can facilitate this but can occur in an ad hoc or variable manner. Advance care planning (ACP) is a formalized process of communication between patients, relatives and professional caregivers about patients' values and care preferences. It raises awareness of the need to anticipate possible future deterioration of health. ACP has the potential to improve current and future healthcare decision-making, provide patients with a sense of control, and improve their quality of life. METHODS/

designWe will study the effects of the ACP program Respecting Choices on the quality of life of patients with advanced lung or colorectal cancer. In a phase III multicenter cluster randomised controlled trial, 22 hospitals in 6 countries will be randomised. In the intervention sites, patients will be offered interviews with a trained facilitator. In the control sites, patients will receive care as usual. In total, 1360 patients will be included. All participating patients will be asked to complete questionnaires at inclusion, and again after 2.5 and 4.5 months. If a patient dies within a year after inclusion, a relative will be asked to complete a questionnaire on end-of-life care. Use of medical care will be assessed by checking medical files. The primary endpoint is patients' quality of life at 2.5 months post-inclusion. Secondary endpoints are the extent to which care as received is aligned with patients' preferences, patients' evaluation of decision-making processes, quality of end-of-life care and cost-effectiveness of the intervention. A complementary qualitative study will be carried out to explore the lived experience of engagement with the Respecting Choices program from the perspectives of patients, their Personal Representatives, healthcare providers and facilitators. DISCUSSION: Transferring the concept of ACP from care of the elderly to patients with advanced cancer, who on average are younger and retain their mental capacity for a larger part of their disease trajectory, is an important next step in an era of increased focus on patient centered healthcare and shared decision-making.

trial registrationInternational Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number: ISRCTN63110516. Date of registration: 10/3/2014.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningAdultAgedAged, 80 and overColorectal NeoplasmsCommunicationDecision MakingFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPatient-Centered CareQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesAdvance care planningMedical decision-makingOncologyQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID27059593
PMCPMC4826555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.