ReviewBrain research2016
There has been an awakening: Emerging mechanisms of C9orf72 mutations in FTD/ALS.
Review in Brain research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
108 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 159 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic and Comprehensive Review on Disease-Causing Genes in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2020Pooled it
- Integrative synaptosome multi-omics reveals disrupted synapse organization and localized cryptic transcripts in C9ORF72-frontotemporal dementia.Acta neuropathologica · 2026Article
- Intrathecal (GActa neuropathologica communications · 2026Article
- Lipid Composition Modulates Secondary Structure at the Biocondensate-Membrane Interface.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Transcription and cohesin direct domain boundary spatial positioning and are linked to Friedreich's ataxia.Molecular cell · 2026Article
- Article
- Intrathecal (GbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Blocking RAN translation without altering repeat RNAs rescuesScience (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Aberrant splicing exonizes C9orf72 repeat expansion in ALS/FTD.Nature neuroscience · 2025Article
- DNA methylation as a contributor to dysregulation of STX6 and other frontotemporal Lobar degeneration genetic risk-associated loci.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2025Article
- DNA methylation as a contributor to dysregulation ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Neuronal polyunsaturated fatty acids are protective in ALS/FTD.Nature neuroscience · 2025Article
- Review
- NLS-binding deficient Kapβ2 reduces neurotoxicity via selective interaction with C9orf72-ALS/FTD dipeptide repeats.Communications biology · 2025Article
- C9orf72 role in myeloid cells: new perspectives in the investigation of the neuro-immune crosstalk in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia.Annals of translational medicine · 2024Article
- Hybrid PET/MRI in Neurodegenerative Disorders.Advances in clinical radiology · 2024Article
- The exocyst subunit EXOC2 regulates the toxicity of expanded GGGGCC repeats in C9ORF72-ALS/FTD.Cell reports · 2024Article
- The Roles of hnRNP Family in the Brain and Brain-Related Disorders.Molecular neurobiology · 2024Review
- Review
- PCDHA9 as a candidate gene for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Nature communications · 2024Article
48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The discovery of C9orf72 mutations as the most common genetic cause of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) has awakened a surge of interest in deciphering how mutations in this mysterious gene cause disease and what can be done to stop it. C9orf72 harbors a hexanucleotide repeat, GGGGCC, in a non-coding region of the gene and a massive expansion of this repeat causes ALS, FTD, or both (FTD/ALS). Many questions lie ahead. What does this gene normally do? What is the consequence of an enormous GGGGCC repeat expansion on that gene's function? Could that hexanucleotide repeat expansion have additional pathological actions unrelated to C9orf72 function? There has been tremendous progress on all fronts in the quest to define how C9orf72 mutations cause disease. Many new experimental models have been constructed and unleashed in powerful genetic screens. Studies in mouse and human patient samples, including iPS-derived neurons, have provided unprecedented insights into pathogenic mechanisms. Three major hypotheses have emerged and are still being hotly debated in the field. These include (1) loss of function owing to decrease in the abundance of C9orf72 protein and its ability to carryout its still unknown cellular role; (2) RNA toxicity from bidirectionally transcribed sense (GGGGCC) and antisense (GGCCCC) transcripts that accumulate in RNA foci and might sequester critical RNA-binding proteins; (3) proteotoxicity from dipeptide repeat proteins produced by an unconventional form of translation from the expanded nucleotide repeats. Here we review the evidence in favor and against each of these three hypotheses. We also suggest additional experiments and considerations that we propose will help clarify which mechanism(s) are most important for driving disease and therefore most critical for considering during the development of therapeutic interventions. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled SI:RNA Metabolism in Disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.