Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27059346›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2016

Effectiveness of Pentavalent Rotavirus Vaccine Against a Diverse Range of Circulating Strains in Nicaragua.

Manish Patel, Cristina Pedreira, Lúcia Helena De Oliveira, Jacqueline Tate, Eyal Leshem, Juan Mercado, Jazmina Umaña, Angel Balmaceda, Martha Reyes, Tara Kerin and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Global Experience With Rotavirus Vaccines.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Health Impact of Rotavirus Vaccination in Developing Countries: Progress and Way Forward.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Manish PatelCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Cristina PedreiraPan American Health Organization, Washington D.C.
Lúcia Helena De OliveiraPan American Health Organization, Washington D.C.
Jacqueline TateCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Eyal LeshemCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Juan MercadoMinisterio de Salud, Managua, Nicaragua.
Jazmina UmañaMinisterio de Salud, Managua, Nicaragua.
Angel BalmacedaMinisterio de Salud, Managua, Nicaragua.
Martha ReyesMinisterio de Salud, Managua, Nicaragua.
Tara KerinCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Sharla McDonaldCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Jon GentschCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Michael D BowenCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Umesh ParasharCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USMinisterio de Salud · NIWorld Health Organization Regional Office for the Americas · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBecause >60 rotavirus strains have been reported worldwide, concerns exist about strain replacement after the introduction of rotavirus vaccines, particularly in developing countries with diverse strains and lower efficacy.

methodsWe used the case-control design in 4 hospitals in Nicaragua to assess strain-specific vaccine effectiveness (VE) of a pentavalent rotavirus vaccine (RotaTeq) against rotavirus diarrhea. Cases were identified through prospective strain surveillance with reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for 3 years among children hospitalized for diarrhea, and controls were children negative for rotavirus.

resultsWe enrolled 1178 case-patients, 1082 (92%) with G and P typing, and 4927 controls. A different strain predominated each year with increasing age of the vaccine-eligible cohort during the study period: G2P[4] in 2008 (97%; mean age, 11.9 months), G1P[8] in 2009 (55%; mean age, 17.0 months), and G3P[8] in 2010 (78%; mean age, 17.3 months). Overall VE was 45% (95% confidence interval, 25%-59%). Regardless of the strain, VE estimates were 12%-79% lower among children aged ≥12 months relative to those 6-11 months of age. The lower VE for G3P[8] was related to the higher mean age of cases (17.3 months) compared with the G2P[4] strains (11.9 months), with a significant trend (R(2)= 0.819;P< .001) of declining effectiveness with increasing mean age of the cases.

conclusionsIntroduction of RotaTeq did not result in sustained emergence of any particular strain in Nicaragua. Variation in strain-specific effectiveness was due to an age-related decline in effectiveness rather than differences in protection against the observed strains.

Indexed as

Case-Control StudiesChild, HospitalizedChild, PreschoolDeveloping CountriesDiarrheaFecesFemaleGastroenteritisGenotypeHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineInfantMaleNicaraguaProspective StudiesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRotaTeqRotavirus VaccinesVaccines, AttenuateddiarrheaRotaTeqrotavirusstrainsvaccine effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID27059346
PMCPMC11995302
OpenAlexW2322194849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.