Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27059309›Full record

ReviewJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2016

A comprehensive review on learning curve associated problems in endoscopic vein harvesting and the requirement for a standardised training programme.

Bhuvaneswari Krishnamoorthy, William R Critchley, Rajamiyer V Venkateswaran, James Barnard, Ann Caress, James E Fildes, Nizar Yonan

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Endoscopic vein harvesting.Journal of thoracic disease · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bhuvaneswari KrishnamoorthyDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK. bhuvaneswari.bibleraaj@uhsm.nhs.uk.
William R CritchleyThe Transplant Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK.
Rajamiyer V VenkateswaranDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK.
James BarnardDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK.
Ann CaressThe School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9NT, UK.
James E FildesThe Transplant Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK.
Nizar YonanDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK.
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Department of Health CDRF-2013-04-040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic vein harvesting is becoming one of the most favourable vein harvesting techniques in multiple bypass coronary surgery, due to its short term post-operative benefits with high patient satisfaction. However, long-term graft patency has been both supported and questioned in the literature. Graft failure can be affected by harvesting methods and operator's experience. Endoscopic vein harvesting is associated with a learning curve period, during which the incidence of vein trauma is high due to unfamiliarity with the surgical technique. There is a paucity of structured learning tools for novice practitioners, meaning that training differs significantly between hospital centres. Inconsistent training methods can lead to poor surgical technique, which can have a significant impact on vein quality and stress level of the practitioner. In turn, this can lead to increased postoperative complications and longer surgical duration. The main aim of this literature review is to understand the impact of the learning curve on the vein conduit and whether there is a requirement for a standardised training programme for the novice practitioners.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceLearning CurveCoronary Artery BypassEndoscopyGraft SurvivalHumansMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsSaphenous VeinTime FactorsTissue and Organ HarvestingCoronary artery bypassEndoscopic vein harvestingLearning curveSaphenous vein

Identifiers

PMID27059309
PMCPMC4825086
OpenAlexW2325127146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.