Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27059189›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN2016

Guiding Lay Navigation in Geriatric Patients With Cancer Using a Distress Assessment Tool.

Gabrielle B Rocque, Richard A Taylor, Aras Acemgil, Xuelin Li, Maria Pisu, Kelly Kenzik, Bradford E Jackson, Karina I Halilova, Wendy Demark-Wahnefried, Karen Meneses and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Impact of Travel Time on Health Care Costs and Resource Use by Phase of Care for Older Patients With Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Gabrielle B RocqueUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center
Richard A TaylorUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center
Aras AcemgilUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center
Xuelin LiUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham School of Nursing
Maria PisuUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center
Kelly KenzikUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham School of Nursing
Bradford E JacksonPreventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine
Karina I HalilovaUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center
Wendy Demark-WahnefriedUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center
Karen MenesesUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center
Yufeng LiUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center
Michelle Y MartinUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham School of Nursing
Carol ChamblessUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center
Nedra LisoviczUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center
Mona FouadUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center
Edward E PartridgeUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center
Elizabeth A KvaleUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center
Patient Care Connect Group

Funding

XRAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA013148 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Robert S Welner · 1985 to 2026
$165.9M
UAB Health Services Research (HSR) Training ProgramT32HS013852 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI LEVITAN, EMILY B, MUGAVERO, MICHAEL J · 2003 to 2024
$8.0M
UAB K12 in Patient Centered Outcomes ResearchK12HS023009 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI SAAG, KENNETH G · 2014 to 2018
$4.0M
AHRQ HHS HS013852AHRQ HHS K12 HS023009AHRQ HHS T32 HS013852NCI NIH HHS P30 CA013148PHS HHS 1C1CMS331023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is growing interest in psychosocial care and evaluating distress in patients with cancer. As of 2015, the Commission on Cancer requires cancer centers to screen patients for distress, but the optimal approach to implementation remains unclear.

methodsWe assessed the feasibility and impact of using distress assessments to frame lay navigator interactions with geriatric patients with cancer who were enrolled in navigation between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2014.

resultsOf the 5,121 patients enrolled in our lay patient navigation program, 4,520 (88%) completed at least one assessment using a standardized distress tool (DT). Navigators used the tool to structure both formal and informal distress assessments. Of all patients, 24% reported distress scores of 4 or greater and 5.5% reported distress scores of 8 or greater. The most common sources of distress at initial assessment were pain, balance/mobility difficulties, and fatigue. Minority patients reported similar sources of distress as the overall program population, with increased relative distress related to logistical issues, such as transportation and financial/insurance questions. Patients were more likely to ask for help with questions about insurance/financial needs (79%), transportation (76%), and knowledge deficits about diet/nutrition (76%) and diagnosis (66%) when these items contributed to distress.

conclusionsLay navigators were able to routinely screen for patient distress at a high degree of penetration using a structured distress assessment.

Indexed as

Patient NavigationStress, PsychologicalAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasmsPatient Care

Identifiers

PMID27059189
PMCPMC6212299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.