Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2016
Effect of hemoadsorption during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery - a blinded, randomized, controlled pilot study using a novel adsorbent.
Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 78 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Cytokine Removal in Cardiopulmonary Bypass Patients Using the Cytosorb ™ Filter
Investigation of Inflammatory Parameters in a Perioperative Closed-meshed Standard Progress in CPB Patients
The Impact of Pre-emptive Intraoperative Use of Extracorporeal Cytokine Adsorption During Orthotopic Heart Transplantation
Revealing Mechanisms and Investigating Efficacy of Hemoadsorption for Prevention of Vasodilatory Shock in Cardiac Surgery Patients With Infective Endocarditis - a Multicentric Randomized Controlled Group Sequential Trial
HaemoAdsorption Nach Reanimation An ECMO
Who cites it
78 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 168 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intraoperative hemoadsorption and cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Pooled it
- 2024 EACTS/EACTAIC/EBCP Guidelines on cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery.British journal of anaesthesia · 2025Guideline
- The role of hemoadsorption in cardiac surgery - a systematic review.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Pooled it
- Effects of interventions targeting the systemic inflammatory response to cardiac surgery on clinical outcomes in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy of CytoSorb®: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Pooled it
- Hemoadsorption in Heart Failure Requiring Mechanical Circulatory Support-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Mortality and adverse events of hemoadsorption with CytoSorb® in critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2022Pooled it
- In vitro Validation of a Novel Disposable Remover to Remove Activated Leukocytes Generated During Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Pilot Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Trial
- REmoval of cytokines during CArdiac surgery (RECCAS): a randomised controlled trial.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Influence of hemoadsorption during cardiopulmonary bypass on blood vesicle count and function.Journal of translational medicine · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Extracorporeal HemadsorptionCardiovascular therapeutics · 2020Trial
- Review
- Cardiopulmonary bypass elevates the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and reduces lymphocyte counts: a comparison of on-pump versus off-pump CABG.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Technicalities, current evidence, and clinical indications of hemoadsorption in critically ill children.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Review
- The International, Prospective COSMOS (CytOSorb® TreatMent Of Critically Ill PatientS) Registry: Interim Results in Patients with Septic Shock.Annals of intensive care · 2026Article
- Hemadsorption with CytoSorb®: focus on the latest experiences in cardiac surgery patients.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2025Review
- From critical care to organ preservation: the potential role of hemadsorption in transplantation-a narrative review.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2025Review
18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery initiates a systemic inflammatory response, which is associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality. Hemoadsorption (HA) of cytokines may suppress inflammatory responses and improve outcomes. We tested a new sorbent used for HA (CytoSorb™; CytoSorbents Europe GmbH, Berlin, Germany) installed in the CPB circuit on changes of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines levels, inflammation markers, and differences in patients' perioperative course.
methodsIn this first pilot trial, 37 blinded patients were undergoing elective CPB surgery at the Medical University of Vienna and were randomly assigned to HA (n = 19) or control group (n = 18). The primary outcome was differences of cytokine levels (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-18, TNF-α, and IL-10) within the first five postoperative days. We also analyzed whether we can observe any differences in ex vivo lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced TNF-α production, a reduction of high-mobility box group 1 (HMGB1), or other inflammatory markers. Additionally, measurements for fluid components, blood products, catecholamine treatment, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and 30-day mortality were analyzed.
resultsWe did not find differences in our primary outcome immediately following the HA treatment, although we observed differences for IL-10 24 hours after CPB (HA: median 0.3, interquartile range (IQR) 0-4.5; control: not traceable, P = 0.0347) and 48 hours after CPB (median 0, IQR 0-1.2 versus not traceable, P = 0.0185). We did not find any differences for IL-6 between both groups, and other cytokines were rarely expressed. We found differences in pretreatment levels of HMGB1 (HA: median 0, IQR 0-28.1; control: median 48.6, IQR 12.7-597.3, P = 0.02083) but no significant changes to post-treatment levels. No differences in inflammatory markers, fluid administration, blood substitution, catecholamines, BIA, or 30-day mortality were found.
conclusionsWe did not find any reduction of the pro-inflammatory response in our patients and therefore no changes in their perioperative course. However, IL-10 showed a longer-lasting anti-inflammatory effect. The clinical impact of prolonged IL-10 needs further evaluation. We also observed strong inter-individual differences in cytokine levels; therefore, patients with an exaggerated inflammatory response to CPB need to be identified. The implementation of HA during CPB was feasible.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01879176, registration date: June 7, 2013.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.