ArticleCell2016
SMITten by the Speed of Splicing.
Article in Cell, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unlocking Barley's Phosphorus Efficiency: The Emerging Role of RNA Processing in Low-Phosphorus Adaptation.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Splicing occurs co-transcriptionally, but relative rates of splicing and transcription that might reveal mechanisms of their coordinated control have remained mysterious. Now, Carrillo Oesterreich et al. show that the fastest introns are gone nearly as soon as the 3' splice site is transcribed and that introns have distinct splicing kinetics with respect to polymerase progression along the gene.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27058658What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.