Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27058556›Full record

ReviewNutrients2016

The Intestinal Microbiota in Metabolic Disease.

Anni Woting, Michael Blaut

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03441802 (Gut Microbiota as a Novel Therapeutic Target for Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases in Obese and Non-obese Adult Subjects), which is not on this map. Cited by 155 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
155citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
16.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03441802 nacompletednot on this map

Gut Microbiota as a Novel Therapeutic Target for Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases in Obese and Non-obese Adult Subjects

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETSRan2014 to 2017Enrolled36ConditionsObesityArmsHigh quality extra virgin olive oil
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

155 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 279 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Biomolecules · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. PeerJ · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Polysaccharides fromNutrients · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The advantages ofFuture microbiology · 2025
    Review

95 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anni WotingDepartment of Gastrointestinal Microbiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Arthur-Scheunert-Allee 114-116, 14558 Nuthetal, Germany. anni.woting@dife.de.
Michael BlautDepartment of Gastrointestinal Microbiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Arthur-Scheunert-Allee 114-116, 14558 Nuthetal, Germany. blaut@dife.de.
German Institute of Human Nutrition · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gut bacteria exert beneficial and harmful effects in metabolic diseases as deduced from the comparison of germfree and conventional mice and from fecal transplantation studies. Compositional microbial changes in diseased subjects have been linked to adiposity, type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia. Promotion of an increased expression of intestinal nutrient transporters or a modified lipid and bile acid metabolism by the intestinal microbiota could result in an increased nutrient absorption by the host. The degradation of dietary fiber and the subsequent fermentation of monosaccharides to short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) is one of the most controversially discussed mechanisms of how gut bacteria impact host physiology. Fibers reduce the energy density of the diet, and the resulting SCFA promote intestinal gluconeogenesis, incretin formation and subsequently satiety. However, SCFA also deliver energy to the host and support liponeogenesis. Thus far, there is little knowledge on bacterial species that promote or prevent metabolic disease. Clostridium ramosum and Enterococcus cloacae were demonstrated to promote obesity in gnotobiotic mouse models, whereas bifidobacteria and Akkermansia muciniphila were associated with favorable phenotypes in conventional mice, especially when oligofructose was fed. How diet modulates the gut microbiota towards a beneficial or harmful composition needs further research. Gnotobiotic animals are a valuable tool to elucidate mechanisms underlying diet-host-microbe interactions.

Indexed as

AdiposityAnimalsBacteriaDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2DyslipidemiasFatty Acids, VolatileHumansIntestinesFatty Acids, Volatileabsorptionbile acidsdiabetesdietenergy harvestintestinal microbiotalow-grade inflammationmetabolic syndromeobesitySCFA

Identifiers

PMID27058556
PMCPMC4848671
OpenAlexW2321626140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.