Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27058431›Full record

ReviewGene2016

Small Maf proteins (MafF, MafG, MafK): History, structure and function.

Fumiki Katsuoka, Masayuki Yamamoto

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gene, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 149 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
149citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

149 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 247 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cross-phenotype analysis of Immunochip data identifiesAnnals of the rheumatic diseases · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Molecular predictors of recurrence in vestibular schwannomas: a transcriptomic and RT-qPCR analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Sexually Dimorphic and Intersex-Specific Transcriptional Responses inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

89 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fumiki KatsuokaDepartment of Integrative Genomics, Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8573, Japan. Electronic address: kfumiki@med.tohoku.ac.jp.
Masayuki YamamotoDepartment of Integrative Genomics, Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8573, Japan; Department of Medical Biochemistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai 980-8575, Japan.
Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization · JPTohoku University · JP

Funding

The Gene Wiki: Community intelligence applied to gene annotationR01GM089820 · NIGMS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI SU, ANDREW I · 2010 to 2021
$5.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM089820
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The small Maf proteins (sMafs) are basic region leucine zipper (bZIP)-type transcription factors. The basic region of the Maf family is unique among the bZIP factors, and it contributes to the distinct DNA-binding mode of this class of proteins. MafF, MafG and MafK are the three vertebrate sMafs, and no functional differences have been observed among them in terms of their bZIP structures. sMafs form homodimers by themselves, and they form heterodimers with cap 'n' collar (CNC) proteins (p45 NF-E2, Nrf1, Nrf2, and Nrf3) and also with Bach proteins (Bach1 and Bach2). Because CNC and Bach proteins cannot bind to DNA as monomers, sMafs are indispensable partners that are required by CNC and Bach proteins to exert their functions. sMafs lack the transcriptional activation domain; hence, their homodimers act as transcriptional repressors. In contrast, sMafs participate in transcriptional activation or repression depending on their heterodimeric partner molecules and context. Mouse genetic analyses have revealed that various biological pathways are under the regulation of CNC-sMaf heterodimers. In this review, we summarize the history and current progress of sMaf studies in relation to their partners.

Indexed as

AnimalsDiseaseDNADNA-Binding ProteinsHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansMafF Transcription FactorMafG Transcription FactorMafK Transcription FactorMiceNuclear ProteinsRepressor ProteinsDNADNA-Binding ProteinsMaff protein, mouseMafF Transcription FactorMafg protein, mouseMafG Transcription FactorMafk protein, mouseMafK Transcription FactorNuclear ProteinsRepressor ProteinsbZIP transcription factorMafFMafGMafKSmall Maf

Identifiers

PMID27058431
PMCPMC4911266
OpenAlexW2332199262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.