Contingency management works, clients like it, and it is cost-effective.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Translating transdermal alcohol monitoring procedures for contingency management among adults recently arrested for DWI.Addictive behaviors · 2018
   Article
2. A Mixed-methods Evaluation of an Addiction/Cardiology Pilot Clinic With Contingency Management for Patients With Stimulant-associated Cardiomyopathy.Journal of addiction medicine
   Article
3. Harm reduction in practice: baseline cohort description and early engagement trends in an incentive-based program for PWUD.Therapeutic advances in infectious disease
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Interest and preferences for contingency management design among addiction treatment clientele.2016

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as