Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27058145›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience2016

Post-exercise depression following submaximal and maximal isometric voluntary contraction.

David A Cunningham, Daniel Janini, Alexandria Wyant, Corin Bonnett, Nicole Varnerin, Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian, Kelsey A Potter-Baker, Sarah Roelle, Xiaofeng Wang, Vlodek Siemionow and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Inhibition versus facilitation of contralesional motor cortices in stroke: Deriving a model to tailor brain stimulation.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2017
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David A CunninghamDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States; School of Biomedical Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, OH, United States.
Daniel JaniniDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Alexandria WyantDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States; Center for Neurological Restoration, Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Corin BonnettDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Nicole VarnerinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Vishwanath SankarasubramanianDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Kelsey A Potter-BakerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Sarah RoelleDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Xiaofeng WangDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Vlodek SiemionowDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Guang H YueHuman Performance & Engineering Research, Kessler Foundation, West Orange, NJ, United States; Department of Physical Medicine & Rehab, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, United States. Electronic address: Gyue@kesslerfoundation.org.
Ela B PlowDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States; Center for Neurological Restoration, Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States; Department of Physical Medicine & Rehab, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States. Electronic address: plowe2@ccf.org.
Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · USCleveland Clinic · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

MENTAL TRAINING EFFECTS ON VOLUNTARY MUSCLE STRENGTHR01NS035130 · NINDS · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI YUE, GUANG H · 1997 to 2012
$1.7M
Brain Stimulation- aided Stroke Rehabilitation: Neural Mechanisms of RecoveryK01HD069504 · NICHD · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI PLOW, ELA B · 2011 to 2015
$531k
NICHD NIH HHS K01 HD069504NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS035130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well known that corticomotor excitability is altered during the post-exercise depression following fatigue within the primary motor cortex (M1). However, it is currently unknown whether corticomotor reorganization following muscle fatigue differs between magnitudes of force and whether corticomotor reorganization occurs measured with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Fifteen young healthy adults (age 23.8±1.4, 8 females) participated in a within-subjects, repeated measures design study, where they underwent three testing sessions separated by one-week each. Subjects performed separate sessions of each: low-force isometric contraction (30% maximal voluntary contraction [MVC]), high-force isometric contraction (95% MVC) of the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle until self-perceived exhaustion, as well as one session of a 30-min rest as a control. We examined changes in corticomotor map area, excitability and location of the FDI representation in and around M1 using TMS. The main finding was that following low-force, but not high-force fatigue (HFF) corticomotor map area and excitability reduced [by 3cm(2) (t(14)=-2.94, p=0.01) and 56% respectively t(14)=-4.01, p<0.001)]. Additionally, the region of corticomotor excitability shifted posteriorly (6.4±2.5mm) (t(14)=-6.33, p=.019). Corticomotor output became less excitable particularly in regions adjoining M1. Overall, post-exercise depression is present in low-force, but not for HFF. Further, low-force fatigue (LFF) results in a posterior shift in corticomotor output. These changes may be indicative of increased sensory feedback from the somatosensory cortex during the recovery phase of fatigue.

Indexed as

ExerciseIsometric ContractionMuscle FatigueAdultElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansMaleMotor CortexMuscle, SkeletalTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung Adultfatiguehealthyisometric contractionpost-exercise depressionprimary motor cortextranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID27058145
PMCPMC7062044
OpenAlexW2319739307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.