Observational studyMedicine2016
The Effect of Anesthetic Type on Outcomes of Hip Fracture Surgery: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparing perioperative outcomes between regional anesthesia and general anesthesia in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2024Pooled it
- Influence of urinary tract infections on the incidence of surgical site infections following hip fracture surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2024Pooled it
- Perioperative outcomes in different anesthesia techniques for patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC anesthesiology · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- General vs. neuraxial anaesthesia in hip fracture patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC anesthesiology · 2017Pooled it
- Article
- Predictors of postoperative survival and mortality in nonagenarian surgical patients: a retrospective cohort study.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- General versus Neuraxial Anesthesia on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Hip Fracture Surgery: An Analysis of the ACS NSQIP Database.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of anesthesia type on hip fracture post-surgery outcomes.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2022Article
- General versus regional anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery - impact on mortality and length of stay.Anaesthesiology intensive therapy · 2022Article
- Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Analgesia and Pain Modalities in Hip Fracture Pathogenesis.Current pain and headache reports · 2019Review
- Regional Anesthesia and Readmission Rates After Total Knee Arthroplasty.Anesthesia and analgesia · 2019Article
- Complications after hip fracture surgery: are they preventable?European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hip fractures are a global public health problem. During surgery following hip fractures, both general and regional anesthesia are used, but which type of anesthesia offers a better outcome remains controversial. There has been little research evaluating different anesthetic types on mortality and readmission rates for hip fracture surgery using nationwide population-based data.We used nationwide population-based data to examine the effect of anesthetic type on mortality and readmission rates for hip fracture surgery.Retrospective observational study.General acute care hospitals throughout Taiwan.A total of 17,189 patients hospitalized for hip fracture surgery in 2011.Generalized estimating equation models with propensity score weighting were performed after adjustment for patient, surgeon, and hospital characteristics to examine the associations of anesthesia type with 30-day all-cause mortality, 30-day all-cause readmission, and 30-day specific-cause readmission (including surgical site infection, sepsis, acute respiratory failure, acute stroke, acute myocardial infarction, acute renal failure, deep vein thrombosis, pneumonia, and urinary tract infection).Of 17,189 patients, 11,153 (64.9%) received regional anesthesia and 6036 (35.1%) received general anesthesia. Overall, the 30-day mortality rate was 1.7%, and the 30-day readmission rate was 12.3%. Regional anesthesia was not associated with decreased 30-day all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-1.18, P = 0.409), but associated with decreased 30-day all-cause readmission and surgical site infection readmission relative to general anesthesia (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.75-0.93, P = 0.001 and OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.49-0.97, P = 0.031).Regional anesthesia is not associated with 30-day mortality, but is associated with lower 30-day all-cause and surgical site infection readmission compared with general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.