ArticleCanadian journal of kidney health and disease2016
Validation of administrative database codes for acute kidney injury in kidney transplant recipients.
Article in Canadian journal of kidney health and disease, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation of Recorded Diagnoses of Acute Kidney Injury Among Surgical Patients in the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination Database.Journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Sensitivity and positive predictive value of diagnosis codes for acute kidney injury in Denmark.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Article
- Continuation Versus Discontinuation of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors and Cardiorenal Outcomes Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Nationwide Cohort Study With a Target Trial Emulation Framework.Clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Estimating the Association Between Outdoor Temperature and Acute Kidney Injury Using Alternative Case Definitions.Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Incidence and predictors of acute kidney injury after elective surgery for lumbar degenerative disease: A 13-year analysis of the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2024Article
- An introduction to ICD code development for pediatric neurology.Annals of the Child Neurology Society · 2023Review
- A retrospective cohort analysis leveraging augmented intelligence to characterize long COVID in the electronic health record: A precision medicine framework.PLOS digital health · 2023Article
- Shortcomings of Administrative Data to Derive Preventive Strategies for Inhospital Drug-Induced Acute Kidney Failure-Insights from Patient Record Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Use of a hospital administrative database to identify and characterize community-acquired, hospital-acquired and drug-induced acute kidney injury.Journal of nephrology · 2022Article
- Observational
- Validation of Administrative Coding and Clinical Notes for Hospital-Acquired Acute Kidney Injury in Adults.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2021Article
- Article
- Comparison of International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision Codes With Electronic Medical Records Among Patients With Symptoms of Coronavirus Disease 2019.JAMA network open · 2020Article
- Impact of Different Electronic Cohort Definitions to Identify Patients With Atrial Fibrillation From the Electronic Medical Record.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Article
- Transesophageal Echocardiography, Acute Kidney Injury, and Length of Hospitalization Among Adults Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia · 2020Article
- Sickle cell trait and renal disease among African American U.S. Army soldiers.British journal of haematology · 2019Article
- Association of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug Prescriptions With Kidney Disease Among Active Young and Middle-aged Adults.JAMA network open · 2019Article
- The Effect of Transplant Volume and Patient Case Mix on Center Variation in Kidney Transplantation Outcomes.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2019Article
- Nationwide claims data validated for quality assessments in acute myocardial infarction in the Netherlands.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundValidation studies of acute kidney injury (AKI) diagnostic codes performed in the general population have shown poor sensitivity, but the accuracy of such codes in the kidney transplant population remains unknown.
objectiveThe objective of this study is to determine the accuracy of AKI diagnostic codes in kidney transplant recipients. We hypothesized that the sensitivity of diagnostic codes would be significantly greater in the kidney transplant population since these patients are closely followed by nephrologists and are more likely to have serum creatinine measured.
designThe design is a population-based retrospective cohort study using healthcare administrative and laboratory databases.
settingThe setting is in Southwestern Ontario and Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, from 2003 to 2012. PATIENTS: We included first-time kidney transplant recipients admitted to hospital for whom serum creatinine was measured in hospital and within 6 months prior (n = 524).
methodsPatients meeting the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) classification serum creatinine change criteria were classified as having AKI. We determined the sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values for the ICD-10-CA code for AKI when present as an admission diagnosis, most responsible diagnosis, or any diagnosis compared to a reference standard of AKI defined by the AKIN criteria (stage 1 or greater, stage 2 or greater, or stage 3).
resultsForty-five percent of included kidney transplant patients had a diagnosis of AKI. The most sensitive coding algorithm (reference standard AKIN stage 2 or greater, ICD-10 code present as any diagnosis) had a sensitivity of 42.1 % (95 % CI 31.7, 53.3), a specificity of 90.6 % (95 % CI 87.6, 93.0), and a positive likelihood ratio of 4.5. The median (IQR) rise in serum creatinine from baseline in patients with and without AKI codes was 104 (57 to 158) μmol/L and 16 (-3 to 41) μmol/L, respectively (Mann-Whitney test, p < 0.0001). LIMITATIONS: The low sensitivity of the AKI code may be due to an alternative diagnosis of acute rejection being assigned in certain cases. The cause of AKI could not be determined.
conclusionsSimilar to the general population, the ICD-10 N17x code misses many kidney transplant patients with AKI during their hospitalization. This makes the code unusable for studying the incidence and consequences of AKI in hospitalized kidney transplant patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.