Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27057077›Full record

ArticleDiscrete applied mathematics (Amsterdam, Netherlands : 1988)2016

Lower Bounds on Paraclique Density.

Ronald D Hagan, Michael A Langston, Kai Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discrete applied mathematics (Amsterdam, Netherlands : 1988), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Comparative Study of Gene Co-Expression Thresholding Algorithms.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Unsupervised dimensionality reduction for exposome research.Current opinion in environmental science & health · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Link Prediction in Multipartite Graphs With Application to Drug Repositioning Studies.IEEE transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ronald D HaganDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA, 37996.
Michael A LangstonDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA, 37996.
Kai WangDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA, 37996.

Funding

Training/Education CoreP20MD000516 · NIMHD · MEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE · PI ZOOROB, ROGER J · 2003 to 2013
$14.2M
Data Structures, Algorithms and Tools for Ontological DiscoveryR01AA018776 · NIAAA · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI CHESLER, ELISSA J · 2010 to 2019
$3.9M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA018776NIMHD NIH HHS P20 MD000516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The scientific literature teems with clique-centric clustering strategies. In this paper we analyze one such method, the paraclique algorithm. Paraclique has found practical utility in a variety of application domains, and has been successfully employed to reduce the effects of noise. Nevertheless, its formal analysis and worst-case guarantees have remained elusive. We address this issue by deriving a series of lower bounds on paraclique densities.

Indexed as

cliqueclusteringgraph densityparaclique

Identifiers

PMID27057077
PMCPMC4820293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.