Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27056703›Full record

ArticleLasers in medical science2016

Comparison of the clinical efficacy and safety of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy and ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy in the treatment of obstructive upper ureteral calculi with concurrent urinary tract infections.

Jun-Tao Jiang, Wei-Guo Li, Yi-Ping Zhu, Wen-Lan Sun, Wei Zhao, Yuan Ruan, Chen Zhong, Kristofer Wood, Hai-Bin Wei, Shu-Jie Xia and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in medical science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jun-Tao JiangDepartment of Urology, Shanghai First People's Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University, 100 Haining road, Shanghai, 200080, China.
Wei-Guo LiDepartment of Urology, Shanghai First People's Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University, 100 Haining road, Shanghai, 200080, China.
Yi-Ping ZhuDepartment of Urology, Shanghai First People's Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University, 100 Haining road, Shanghai, 200080, China.
Wen-Lan SunDepartment of Geriatrics, Shanghai First People's Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University, 100 Haining road, Shanghai, 200080, China.
Wei ZhaoDepartment of Urology, Shanghai First People's Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University, 100 Haining road, Shanghai, 200080, China.
Yuan RuanDepartment of Urology, Shanghai First People's Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University, 100 Haining road, Shanghai, 200080, China.
Chen ZhongDepartment of Urology, Shanghai First People's Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University, 100 Haining road, Shanghai, 200080, China.
Kristofer WoodDepartment of Neurology, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, 350 W. Thomas Rd, Phoenix, AZ, 85013, USA.
Hai-Bin WeiDepartment of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, No. 158, Shangtang Road, Xiacheng District, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China.
Shu-Jie XiaDepartment of Urology, Shanghai First People's Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University, 100 Haining road, Shanghai, 200080, China.
Xiao-Wen SunDepartment of Urology, Shanghai First People's Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University, 100 Haining road, Shanghai, 200080, China. sunxiaow1973@163.com.
Shanghai First People's Hospital · CNBarrow Neurological Institute · USZhejiang Provincial People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (RPLU) and ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy (UHLL) as two minimally invasive procedures in managing obstructive upper ureteral calculi with concurrent urinary tract infections (UTI). The retrospective study included 189 patients who underwent unilateral obstructive upper ureteral stones with concurrent UTI from January 2007 to November 2014 at our institution. Patients received RPLU (81 cases) or UHLL (108 cases). All patients received preoperative anti-infection treatment (indwelling ureteral stent and/or preoperative antibiotics). Collected data, including sex, age, stone size, success rate, operation duration, post-operation hospitalization time, and post-operation complications, were compared. All patients were followed up for more than 6 months after surgeries, and no ureterostenosis occurred. The study included 189 patients, 41 (21.7 %) females and 148 (78.3 %) males with a medium age of 52 years (range 22-81 years). All surgeries were successfully performed without conversion to open surgery. Stone size in the RPLU group was larger than that of the UHLL group (16.1 ± 1.4 vs. 10.4 ± 1.6 mm, P = 0.012). Operative duration (P = 0.009) and hospitalization time (P < 0.001) in the UHLL group were significantly shorter than those in the RPLU group, whereas stone clearance rate was significantly higher in the RPLU group (100 vs. 88.9 %, P = 0.002). Of note, postoperative fever was more common in patients treated with UHLL (15 cases) versus RPLU (4 cases) (13.9 vs. 4.9 %, P = 0.043). Moreover, in the UHLL group, three patients without a preoperative indwelling ureteral stent were complicated with sepsis, which was not seen in RPLU group. In our study, the safety and stone clearance rate of RPLU are better than those of UHLL in the treatment of unilateral upper ureteric calculi with concurrent UTI. Preoperative antibiotics and indwelling ureteral stent may reduce the risk of postoperative infections.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsFemaleHolmiumHumansLaparoscopyLasers, Solid-StateLithotripsy, LaserMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsRetroperitoneal SpaceAnti-Bacterial AgentsHolmiumHydronephrosisLaparoscopic ureterolithotomyObstructive pyelonephritisUpper ureteral stoneUreteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy

Identifiers

PMID27056703
OpenAlexW2323319871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.