Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27056702›Full record

Trial reportLasers in medical science2016

Effects of low-level laser therapy on bone regeneration of the midpalatal suture after rapid maxillary expansion.

Fabíola Nogueira Holanda Ferreira, Juliana Oliveira Gondim, José Jeová Siebra Moreira Neto, Pedro Cesar Fernandes Dos Santos, Karina Matthes de Freitas Pontes, Lúcio Mitsuo Kurita, Maria Walderez Andrade de Araújo

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Orthodontic treatment for posterior crossbites.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fabíola Nogueira Holanda FerreiraDepartment of Dental Clinics, School of Pharmacy, Dentistry and Nursing, Federal University of Ceará, Rua Alexandre Baraúna, 949 - Rodolfo Teófilo, Fortaleza, CE, CEP: 60430160, Brazil. fnhf@yahoo.com.br.
Juliana Oliveira GondimDepartment of Dental Clinics, School of Pharmacy, Dentistry and Nursing, Federal University of Ceará, Rua Alexandre Baraúna, 949 - Rodolfo Teófilo, Fortaleza, CE, CEP: 60430160, Brazil.
José Jeová Siebra Moreira NetoDepartment of Dental Clinics, School of Pharmacy, Dentistry and Nursing, Federal University of Ceará, Rua Alexandre Baraúna, 949 - Rodolfo Teófilo, Fortaleza, CE, CEP: 60430160, Brazil.
Pedro Cesar Fernandes Dos SantosDepartment of Dental Clinics, School of Pharmacy, Dentistry and Nursing, Federal University of Ceará, Rua Alexandre Baraúna, 949 - Rodolfo Teófilo, Fortaleza, CE, CEP: 60430160, Brazil.
Karina Matthes de Freitas PontesDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Pharmacy, Dentistry and Nursing, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Lúcio Mitsuo KuritaDepartment of Dental Clinics, School of Pharmacy, Dentistry and Nursing, Federal University of Ceará, Rua Alexandre Baraúna, 949 - Rodolfo Teófilo, Fortaleza, CE, CEP: 60430160, Brazil.
Maria Walderez Andrade de AraújoDepartment of Dental Clinics, School of Pharmacy, Dentistry and Nursing, Federal University of Ceará, Rua Alexandre Baraúna, 949 - Rodolfo Teófilo, Fortaleza, CE, CEP: 60430160, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Ceará · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on bone regeneration at the midpalatal suture (MPS) after rapid maxillary expansion (RME), using cone beam computed tomography. Fourteen 8-14-year-old patients with transverse maxillary deficiency underwent RME with a Hyrax-type expander activated with one full turn after installation and two half turn daily activations until achieving overcorrection. Patients were randomly assigned to either a control group (RME alone, n = 4) or an experimental group (n = 10) in which RME was followed by 12 LLLT sessions (GaAlAs, p = 70 mW, λ = 780 nm, Ø = 0.04 cm(2)). Two tomographic images of the MPS were obtained-T0, after disjunction and T1, after 4 months. Bone regeneration was evaluated by measuring the optical density (OD) on the tomographic images using InVivo Dental 5.0 software. Data were analyzed by the paired Student's t test (α = 0.05 %). A statistically significant difference between T0 and T1 OD values was observed in the laser-treated group (p = 0.00), but this difference was not significant in the control group (p = 0.20). Intergroup comparison of OD values at T1 revealed higher OD in the laser-treated group (p = 0.05). In conclusion, LLLT had a positive influence on bone regeneration of the midpalatal suture by accelerating the repair process.

Indexed as

Palatal Expansion TechniqueAdolescentBone RegenerationCone-Beam Computed TomographyFemaleHumansLow-Level Light TherapyMalePalateBone remodelingCone beam computed tomographyLow-level laser therapyRapid maxillary expansion

Identifiers

PMID27056702
OpenAlexW2324063834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.