SynthesisThe British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science2016
Transcranial direct current stimulation for acute major depressive episodes: meta-analysis of individual patient data.
Synthesis in The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 164 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Assessment of Efficacy and Safety of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (TDCS) in Pediatric and Teenage Patients With Major Depressive Disorder During COVID-19 Pandemics
Supervised Home-based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) for Major Depressive Disorder
High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (HD-tDCS) as Augmentation Therapy in Late-life Depression (LLD) With Suboptimal Response to Treatment - Double-blinded Randomized Sham-controlled Trial
Transcranial Static Field Stimulation (tSMS) and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) for the Treatment of Neurological Symptoms
Who cites it
164 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 420 citations in OpenAlex.
- Remotely Supervised, Home-Based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Major Depressive Disorder: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR mental health · 2026Pooled it
- Transcranial Electrical Stimulation in Treatment of Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2025Pooled it
- The effectiveness of non-invasive brain stimulation in treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD): a systematic review and transfer analysis.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation combined with antidepressant medications for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Cognitive potency and safety of tDCS treatment for major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Pooled it
- Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Cognitive Deficits in Depression: A Systematic Review.Psychiatry and clinical psychopharmacology · 2023Pooled it
- TDCS at home for depressive disorders: an updated systematic review and lessons learned from a prematurely terminated randomized controlled pilot study.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2023Pooled it
- Motor function improvement and acceptability of non-invasive brain stimulation in patients with Parkinson's disease: a Bayesian network analysis.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Pooled it
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of transcranial direct-current stimulation effects on cognitive function in patients with Alzheimer's disease.Molecular psychiatry · 2022Pooled it
- Transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of post-stroke depression: A systematic review.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Magnetic resonance spectroscopy with transcranial direct current stimulation to explore the underlying biochemical and physiological mechanism of the human brain: A systematic review.Human brain mapping · 2021Pooled it
- Age as a Mediator of tDCS Effects on Pain: An Integrative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy and acceptability of non-surgical brain stimulation for the acute treatment of major depressive episodes in adults: systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2019Pooled it
- Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2016 Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Major Depressive Disorder: Section 4. Neurostimulation Treatments.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2016Pooled it
- Home-based transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for bipolar depression: effects on quality of life and functioning-an open-label study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Trial
- Acceptability of home-based transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in bipolar depression: thematic analysis of individual views.BMC psychiatry · 2025Trial
- Efficacy and safety of home-based transcranial direct current stimulation as adjunct treatment for cognitive improvement in major depressive disorder: A double-blind, randomized, multi-site clinical trial.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025Trial
- Home-based transcranial direct current stimulation treatment for major depressive disorder: a fully remote phase 2 randomized sham-controlled trial.Nature medicine · 2025Trial
- Effect of home-based transcranial direct current stimulation combined with nutritional counseling therapy on binge eating disorder symptoms: a randomized pilot trial.Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999) · 2025Trial
104 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-pharmacological intervention for depression. It has mixed results, possibly caused by study heterogeneity.
aimsTo assess tDCS efficacy and to explore individual response predictors.
methodSystematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.
resultsData were gathered from six randomised sham-controlled trials, enrolling 289 patients. Active tDCS was significantly superior to sham for response (34% v. 19% respectively, odds ratio (OR) = 2.44, 95% CI 1.38-4.32, number needed to treat (NNT) = 7), remission (23.1% v. 12.7% respectively, OR = 2.38, 95% CI 1.22-4.64, NNT = 9) and depression improvement (B coefficient 0.35, 95% CI 0.12-0.57). Mixed-effects models showed that, after adjustment for other predictors and confounders, treatment-resistant depression and higher tDCS 'doses' were, respectively, negatively and positively associated with tDCS efficacy.
conclusionsThe effect size of tDCS treatment was comparable with those reported for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and antidepressant drug treatment in primary care. The most important parameters for optimisation in future trials are depression refractoriness and tDCS dose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.