Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27056592›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2016

Hospital case volume and outcomes for proximal femoral fractures in the USA: an observational study.

David Metcalfe, Ali Salim, Olubode Olufajo, Belinda Gabbe, Cheryl Zogg, Mitchel B Harris, Daniel C Perry, Matthew L Costa

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Effect of Surgeon and Hospital Volume on Morbidity and Mortality After Femoral Shaft Fractures.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Data resource profile: State Inpatient Databases.International journal of epidemiology · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Incidence of osteosynthesis of members in France.International orthopaedics · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

David MetcalfeCenter for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Kadoorie Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Ali SalimCenter for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Olubode OlufajoCenter for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Belinda GabbeDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, The Alfred Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Cheryl ZoggCenter for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Mitchel B HarrisDepartment of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Daniel C PerryUniversity of Liverpool, Liverpool, Merseyside, UK.
Matthew L CostaNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Kadoorie Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.

Funding

Department of Health CS-2014-14-012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore whether older adults with isolated hip fractures benefit from treatment in high-volume hospitals.

designPopulation-based observational study.

settingAll acute hospitals in California, USA.

participantsAll individuals aged ≥65 that underwent an operation for an isolated hip fracture in California between 2007 and 2011. Patients transferred between hospitals were excluded. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Quality indicators (time to surgery) and patient outcomes (length of stay, in-hospital mortality, unplanned 30-day readmission, and selected complications).

results91,401 individuals satisfied the inclusion criteria. Time to operation and length of stay were significantly prolonged in low-volume hospitals, by 1.96 (95% CI 1.20 to 2.73) and 0.70 (0.38 to 1.03) days, respectively. However, there were no differences in clinical outcomes, including in-hospital mortality, 30-day re-admission, and rates of pneumonia, pressure ulcers, and venous thromboembolism.

conclusionsThese data suggest that there is no patient safety imperative to limit hip fracture care to high-volume hospitals.

Indexed as

HospitalizationHospitals, High-VolumeHospitals, Low-VolumeOutcome Assessment, Health CareQuality of Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overCaliforniaFemaleFemoral FracturesFemurHipHip FracturesHospital MortalityHumansLength of Stayhip fractureminimum volume standardsvolume-outcome

Identifiers

PMID27056592
PMCPMC4838676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.