ReviewDer Nervenarzt2017
[Assessment of ability to drive in patients with MCI and dementia].
Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Memory clinics in Germany-structural requirements and areas of responsibility].Der Nervenarzt · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
People with mild cognitive impairment and dementia are a frequent and continuously increasing patient group in practically all fields of medicine. The associated challenges involve nearly all areas of life in addition to the direct medical treatment. Assessment of the ability to drive in patients with cognitive deficits is becoming increasingly more important. What are the options available to physicians in order to make a valid assessment? Which legal aspects must be taken into consideration? Which rights and obligations arise from the framework conditions? These questions nowadays give rise to great uncertainty for many medical personnel; however, the increasing importance of these problems necessitates a clear procedure, which allows difficult decisions to be made with utmost sovereignty and legal certainty and to be able to give patients and relatives a plausible explanation. Because age is a substantial risk factor for the development of cognitive disorders, the question of the ability to drive is affected not only by neuropsychiatric diseases, such as mild cognitive disorders or dementia but also the frequently occurring somatic comorbidities. Estimation of the ability to drive is therefore a complex approach, which should be standardized in order to appreciate all relevant aspects. It would be desirable to have a practice-oriented algorithm, the formulation of which is the aim of this article. Additionally, we would like to make a contribution to road safety and make medical personnel fully aware of this topic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.