Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27056182›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2016

Adherence to and acceptability of home fortification with vitamins and minerals in children aged 6 to 23 months: a systematic review.

Samara Fernandes de Barros, Marly Augusto Cardoso

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samara Fernandes de BarrosDepartment of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, Avenida Dr. Arnaldo 715, São Paulo, SP, 01246-904, Brazil.
Marly Augusto CardosoDepartment of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, Avenida Dr. Arnaldo 715, São Paulo, SP, 01246-904, Brazil. marlyac@usp.br.
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVitamin and mineral deficiencies affect more than two million people worldwide. In 2011, based on recent scientific evidence and the low effectiveness of current strategies, the World Health Organization recommended home fortification of foods with multiple micronutrients in powder (MNP) as a new strategy to prevent and control anaemia during childhood. This systematic review assessed adherence to and acceptability of home fortification with multiple micronutrients in powder (MNP) in complementary feeding.

methodsAdherence was assessed based on number or percentage of prescribed sachets that were consumed, and acceptability was assessed according to perceptions of caregivers and children about MNP.

resultsIn summary, the studies indicated that home fortification with MNP has good adherence, ranging from 50% to over 90% of the prescribed sachets and that MNP was well accepted by caregivers. Caregivers reported side effects in 3% to 32% of children taking MNP in many studies; diarrhoea, vomiting, and constipation were the most common.

conclusionsHome fortification with MNP has good adherence and acceptability in infants, with higher adherence in non-daily or flexible administration regimens. Characteristics of the target population and increased diarrhoea burden should be considered for planning public health programs with long term use of MNP. Acceptability of the MNP is satisfactory, when the use and perceived beneficial effects on children's health are considered.

Indexed as

Infant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnemiaCaregiversFood, FortifiedHumansInfantMineralsPowdersRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVitaminsMineralsPowdersVitaminsComplementary feedingHome fortificationMultiple micronutrients in powder

Identifiers

PMID27056182
PMCPMC4823916
OpenAlexW2323428477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.