Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27056042›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2016

Clinical outcomes and costs for people with complex psychosis; a naturalistic prospective cohort study of mental health rehabilitation service users in England.

Helen Killaspy, Louise Marston, Nicholas Green, Isobel Harrison, Melanie Lean, Frank Holloway, Tom Craig, Gerard Leavey, Maurice Arbuthnott, Leonardo Koeser and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of Everyday Life Rehabilitation (ELR) for individuals with serious mental illness in supported accommodation.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Economic Evidence in Occupational Therapy: A Rapid Review.Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Helen KillaspyDivision of Psychiatry, University College London (UCL), Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK. h.killaspy@ucl.ac.uk.
Louise MarstonDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK.
Nicholas GreenDivision of Psychiatry, University College London (UCL), Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
Isobel HarrisonDivision of Psychiatry, University College London (UCL), Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
Melanie LeanDivision of Psychiatry, University College London (UCL), Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
Frank HollowaySouth London and Maudsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Monks Orchard Road, Beckenham, BR3 3BX, UK.
Tom CraigSouth London and Maudsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Monks Orchard Road, Beckenham, BR3 3BX, UK.
Gerard LeaveyBamford Centre for Mental Health and Wellbeing, University of Ulster, Northland Road, Derry, BT48 7JL, UK.
Maurice ArbuthnottNorth London Service User Research Forum, Division of Psychiatry, UCL, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
Leonardo KoeserCentre for the Economics of Mental and Physical Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, Derry, SE5 8AF, UK.
Paul McCroneCentre for the Economics of Mental and Physical Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, Derry, SE5 8AF, UK.
Rumana Z OmarUCL PRIMENT Clinical Trials Unit, Research Department of Primary Care & Population Health, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK.
Michael KingDivision of Psychiatry, University College London (UCL), Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0610-10097Department of Health RP-PG-0707-10093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMental health rehabilitation services in England focus on people with complex psychosis. This group tend to have lengthy hospital admissions due to the severity of their problems and, despite representing only 10-20 % of all those with psychosis, they absorb 25-50 % of the total mental health budget. Few studies have investigated the effectiveness of these services and there is little evidence available to guide clinicians working in this area. As part of a programme of research into inpatient mental health rehabilitation services, we carried out a prospective study to investigate longitudinal outcomes and costs for patients of these services and the predictors of better outcome.

methodInpatient mental health rehabilitation services across England that scored above average (median) on a standardised quality assessment tool used in a previous national survey were eligible for the study. Unit quality was reassessed and costs of care and patient characteristics rated using standardised tools at recruitment. Multivariable regression modelling was used to investigate the relationship between service quality, patient characteristics and the following clinical outcomes at 12 month follow-up: social function; length of admission in the rehabiliation unit; successful community discharge (without readmission or community placement breakdown) and costs of care.

resultsAcross England, 50 units participated and 329 patients were followed over 12 months (94 % of those recruited). Service quality was not associated with patients' social function or length of admission (median 16 months) at 12 months but most patients were successfully discharged (56 %) or ready for discharge (14 %), with associated reductions in the costs of care. Factors associated with successful discharge were the recovery orientation of the service (OR 1.04, 95 % CI 1.00-1.08), and patients' activity (OR 1.03, 95 % CI 1.01-1.05) and social skills (OR 1.13, 95 % CI 1.04-1.24) at recruitment.

conclusionInpatient mental health rehabilitation services in England are able to successfully discharge over half their patients within 18 months, reducing the costs of care for this complex group. Provision of recovery orientated practice that promotes patients' social skills and activities may further enhance the effectiveness of these services.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareAdultCohort StudiesEnglandFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth Care CostsHospitalizationHumansInpatientsMaleMental Health ServicesProspective StudiesPsychiatric RehabilitationPsychotic Disorders

Identifiers

PMID27056042
PMCPMC4823891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.