Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27056041›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2016

Barriers and facilitators in providing oral health care to nursing home residents, from the perspective of care aides-a systematic review protocol.

Matthias Hoben, Huimin Hu, Tianyuan Xiong, Angelle Kent, Nadia Kobagi, Minn N Yoon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Older People Living in Nursing Homes: An Oral Health Screening Survey in Florence, Italy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matthias HobenKnowledge Utilization Studies Program (KUSP), Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, 5-006 Edmonton Clinic Health Academy (ECHA), 11405 87 Avenue, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1C9, Canada. mhoben@ualberta.ca.
Huimin HuWest China College of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Sichuan, China.
Tianyuan XiongDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Angelle KentFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Nadia KobagiSchool of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Minn N YoonSchool of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnregulated care aides provide up to 80 % of direct resident care in nursing homes. They have little formal training, manage high workloads, frequently experience responsive behaviours from residents, and are at high risk for burnout. This affects quality of resident care, including quality of oral health care. Poor quality of oral health care in nursing homes has severe consequences for residents and the health care system. Improving quality of oral health care requires tailoring interventions to identified barriers and facilitators if these interventions are to be effective. Identifying barriers and facilitators from the care aide's perspective is crucial.

methodsWe will systematically search the databases MEDLINE, Embase, Evidence Based Reviews-Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, and Web of Science. We will include qualitative and quantitative research studies and systematic reviews published in English that assess barriers and facilitators, as perceived by care aides, to providing oral health care to nursing home residents. Two reviewers will independently screen studies for eligibility. We will also search by hand the contents of key journals, publications of key authors, and reference lists of all the studies included. Two reviewers will independently assess the methodological quality of the studies included using four validated checklists appropriate for different research designs. Discrepancies at any stage of review will be resolved by consensus. We will conduct a thematic analysis of barriers and facilitators using all studies included. If quantitative studies are sufficiently homogeneous, we will conduct random-effects meta-analyses of the associations of barriers and facilitators with each other, with care aide practices in resident oral health care, and with residents' oral health. If quantitative study results cannot be pooled, we will present a narrative synthesis of the results. Finally, we will compare quantitative findings to qualitative studies to identify hypothesized associations or effects not yet tested quantitatively. DISCUSSION: This review will advance the development of effective strategies for improving quality of oral health care and highlight gaps in research on barriers and facilitators to providing oral health care to nursing home residents, as perceived by care aides. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42015032454.

Indexed as

Allied Health PersonnelAttitude of Health PersonnelHealth Services AccessibilityHomes for the AgedNursing HomesSystematic Reviews as TopicDental Health ServicesHealth Services for the AgedHumansResearch DesignBarriers and facilitatorsCare aidesNursing homesOral health careQuality improvementQuality of care

Identifiers

PMID27056041
PMCPMC4823843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.