ArticleLeukemia2016
Genetic alterations and their clinical implications in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia.
Article in Leukemia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
70 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 108 citations in OpenAlex.
- Venetoclax combined chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for acute myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Oral decitabine and cedazuridine plus venetoclax for older or unfit patients with acute myeloid leukaemia: a phase 2 study.The Lancet. Haematology · 2024Trial
- Sorafenib Combined with 5-azacytidine in Older Patients with Untreated FLT3-ITD Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia.American journal of hematology · 2018Trial
- Epidemiological, genetic, and clinical characterization by age of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia based on an academic population-based registry study (AMLSG BiO).Annals of hematology · 2017Trial
- Clinico-biological significance of suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 expression in acute myeloid leukemia.Blood cancer journal · 2017Trial
- Prognostic impact of ASXL1 mutations in acute myeloid leukemia treated with lower intensity therapy.Cancer · 2026Article
- Molecular abnormalities and clinical features in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia in Thailand.Diagnostic pathology · 2025Article
- Review
- Hypermethylation of microRNA-34c CpG Island predicts unfavorable prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A molecular-based risk score for predicting leukemia-free survival in adult AML patients undergoing Allo-HSCT.iScience · 2025Article
- Age-stratified machine learning identifies divergent prognostic significance of molecular alterations in AML.HemaSphere · 2025Article
- Long-term survival can be achieved in a significant fraction of older patients with core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia treated with intensive chemotherapy.Haematologica · 2025Article
- Stellae-123 gene expression signature improved risk stratification in taiwanese acute myeloid leukemia patients.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Tolerability and Efficacy of the Anticluster of Differentiation 47 Antibody Magrolimab Combined With Azacitidine in Patients With Previously Untreated AML: Phase Ib Results.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023Article
- Treatment of older adults with FLT3-mutated AML: Emerging paradigms and the role of frontline FLT3 inhibitors.Blood cancer journal · 2023Review
- Genetic Polymorphism Study of IDH 1/2 and TET2 Genes in Acute Myeloid leukemia Patients.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023Article
- The prognostic impact of reduced variant burden in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with decitabine.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2023Article
- TNFAIP3 mutation is an independent poor overall survival factor for patients with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- TP53-Mutated Myelodysplasia and Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2023Review
- How Genetics Can Drive Initial Therapy Choices for Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Current treatment options in oncology · 2022Review
10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A number of patient-specific and leukemia-associated factors are related to the poor outcome in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, comprehensive studies regarding the impact of genetic alterations in this group of patients are limited. In this study, we compared relevant mutations in 21 genes between AML patients aged 60 years or older and those younger and exposed their prognostic implications. Compared with the younger patients, the elderly had significantly higher incidences of PTPN11, NPM1, RUNX1, ASXL1, TET2, DNMT3A and TP53 mutations but a lower frequency of WT1 mutations. The older patients more frequently harbored one or more adverse genetic alterations. Multivariate analysis showed that DNMT3A and TP53 mutations were independent poor prognostic factors among the elderly, while NPM1 mutation in the absence of FLT3/ITD was an independent favorable prognostic factor. Furthermore, the status of mutations could well stratify older patients with intermediate-risk cytogenetics into three risk groups. In conclusion, older AML patients showed distinct genetic alterations from the younger group. Integration of cytogenetics and molecular mutations can better risk-stratify older AML patients. Development of novel therapies is needed to improve the outcome of older patients with poor prognosis under current treatment modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.