Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27055827›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2016

RegenBase: a knowledge base of spinal cord injury biology for translational research.

Alison Callahan, Saminda W Abeyruwan, Hassan Al-Ali, Kunie Sakurai, Adam R Ferguson, Phillip G Popovich, Nigam H Shah, Ubbo Visser, John L Bixby, Vance P Lemmon

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Life of a Trailing Spouse.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Reconnecting Eye to Brain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alison CallahanStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Saminda W AbeyruwanDepartment of Computer Science, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33146.
Hassan Al-AliMiami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136.
Kunie SakuraiMiami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136.
Adam R FergusonBrain and Spinal Injury Center (BASIC), Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco; San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA 94143.
Phillip G PopovichCenter for Brain and Spinal Cord Repair and the Department of Neuroscience, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210.
Nigam H ShahStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Ubbo VisserDepartment of Computer Science, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33146.
John L BixbyMiami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136 Center for Computational Science, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33146 Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
Vance P LemmonMiami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136 Center for Computational Science, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33146 vlemmon@miami.edu.

Funding

Novel Gene Targets for CNS Axonal RegenerationR01HD057632 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BIXBY, JOHN L, LEMMON, VANCE P · 2007 to 2018
$4.7M
Regenbase: A Searchable Database to Organize Regeneration Knowledge via OntologieR01NS080145 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BIXBY, JOHN L, LEMMON, VANCE P · 2012 to 2015
$2.3M
Bioinformatics For Translational Spinal Cord Injury ResearchR01NS067092 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FERGUSON, ADAM R · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
NICHD NIH HHS HD057632NINDS NIH HHS NS080145NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS067092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) research is a data-rich field that aims to identify the biological mechanisms resulting in loss of function and mobility after SCI, as well as develop therapies that promote recovery after injury. SCI experimental methods, data and domain knowledge are locked in the largely unstructured text of scientific publications, making large scale integration with existing bioinformatics resources and subsequent analysis infeasible. The lack of standard reporting for experiment variables and results also makes experiment replicability a significant challenge. To address these challenges, we have developed RegenBase, a knowledge base of SCI biology. RegenBase integrates curated literature-sourced facts and experimental details, raw assay data profiling the effect of compounds on enzyme activity and cell growth, and structured SCI domain knowledge in the form of the first ontology for SCI, using Semantic Web representation languages and frameworks. RegenBase uses consistent identifier schemes and data representations that enable automated linking among RegenBase statements and also to other biological databases and electronic resources. By querying RegenBase, we have identified novel biological hypotheses linking the effects of perturbagens to observed behavioral outcomes after SCI. RegenBase is publicly available for browsing, querying and download.Database URL:http://regenbase.org.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualKnowledge BasesSpinal Cord InjuriesAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansMiceRatsTranslational Research, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID27055827
PMCPMC4823819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.