Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27055820›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2016

Supporting successful implementation of public health interventions: protocol for a realist synthesis.

Marjorie MacDonald, Bernadette Pauly, Geoff Wong, Kara Schick-Makaroff, Thea van Roode, Heather Wilson Strosher, Anita Kothari, Ruta Valaitis, Heather Manson, Warren O'Briain and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Interventions currently implemented among orphans in South-Africa: a scoping review.SAHARA J : journal of Social Aspects of HIV/AIDS Research Alliance · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Marjorie MacDonaldSchool of Nursing, University of Victoria, Room A402a, HSD Building, 3800 Finnerty Road, Victoria, BC, V8P 5C2, Canada. marjorie@uvic.ca.
Bernadette PaulySchool of Nursing, University of Victoria, Room A402a, HSD Building, 3800 Finnerty Road, Victoria, BC, V8P 5C2, Canada.
Geoff WongNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, 2nd Floor, New Radcliffe House, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
Kara Schick-MakaroffFaculty of Nursing, 5-276 Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, 11405-87 Ave, Edmonton, AB, T6R 1C9, Canada.
Thea van RoodeFaculty of Human and Social Development, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, V8P 5C2, Canada.
Heather Wilson StrosherFaculty of Human and Social Development, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, V8P 5C2, Canada.
Anita KothariJoint Graduate Program in Health Information Science, CIHR New Investigator, School of Health Studies, University of Western Ontario, Health Sciences Building, room 222, London, Ontario, Canada.
Ruta ValaitisSchool of Nursing, 3N25E, Health Sciences Centre, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Heather MansonHealth Promotion, Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention, Public Health Ontario | Santé publique Ontario, Suite 300, 480 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V2, Canada.
Warren O'BriainPublic Health Services, British Columbia Ministry of Health, PO Box 9646, STN PROV GOVT, Victoria, BC, V8W9P1, Canada.
Simon CarrollDepartment of Sociology, University of Victoria, PO Box 1700 STN CSC, Victoria, BC, V8W 2Y2, Canada.
Victoria LeeFraser Health Authority, Suite 400, Central City Tower, 13450 - 102nd Avenue, Surrey, BC, V3T 0H1, Canada.
Samantha TongHealth Equity & Population Health Unit, Population and Public Health, Fraser Health Authority, 13450 - 102nd Ave, Surrey, BC, V3T 0H1, Canada.
Karen Dickenson SmithClinical Programs, Population & Public Health, Fraser Health Authority, Suite 400, Central City Tower, 13450 - 102nd Avenue, Surrey, BC, V3T 0H1, Canada.
Megan WardRegion of Peel Public Health, 44 Peel Centre Drive, 4th flr, Brampton, ON, L6T 4B5, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a growing emphasis in public health on the importance of evidence-based interventions to improve population health and reduce health inequities. Equally important is the need for knowledge about how to implement these interventions successfully. Yet, a gap remains between the development of evidence-based public health interventions and their successful implementation. Conventional systematic reviews have been conducted on effective implementation in health care, but few in public health, so their relevance to public health is unclear. In most reviews, stringent inclusion criteria have excluded entire bodies of evidence that may be relevant for policy makers, program planners, and practitioners to understand implementation in the unique public health context. Realist synthesis is a theory-driven methodology that draws on diverse data from different study designs to explain how and why observed outcomes occur in different contexts and thus may be more appropriate for public health.

methodsThis paper presents a realist review protocol to answer the research question: Why are some public health interventions successfully implemented and others not? Based on a review of implementation theories and frameworks, we developed an initial program theory, adapted for public health from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, to explain the implementation outcomes of public health interventions within particular contexts. This will guide us through the review process, which comprises eight iterative steps based on established realist review guidelines and quality standards. We aim to refine this initial theory into a 'final' realist program theory that explains important context-mechanism-outcome configurations in the successful implementation of public health interventions. DISCUSSION: Developing new public health interventions is costly and policy windows that support their implementation can be short lived. Ineffective implementation wastes scarce resources and is neither affordable nor sustainable. Public health interventions that are not implemented will not have their intended effects on improving population health and promoting health equity. This synthesis will provide evidence to support effective implementation of public health interventions taking into account the variable context of interventions. A series of knowledge translation products specific to the needs of knowledge users will be developed to provide implementation support. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42015030052.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CarePublic HealthSystematic Reviews as TopicHumansResearch DesignImplementationKnowledge translationPopulation healthPublic healthPublic health interventionsRealist reviewRealist synthesis

Identifiers

PMID27055820
PMCPMC4823871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.