Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27055030›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Age-Related Differences in the Gastrointestinal Microbiota of Chinstrap Penguins (Pygoscelis antarctica).

Andrés Barbosa, Vanessa Balagué, Francisco Valera, Ana Martínez, Jesús Benzal, Miguel Motas, Julia I Diaz, Alex Mira, Carlos Pedrós-Alió

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Moult-Induced Changes in Gut Microbiota of African Penguins (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Andrés BarbosaDepartamento de Ecología Evolutiva, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
Vanessa BalaguéDepartament de Biologia Marina i Oceanografia, Institut de Ciències del Mar, CSIC, Barcelona, Spain.
Francisco ValeraDepartamento de Ecología Funcional y Evolutiva, Estación Experimental de Zonas Áridas, CSIC, Almería, Spain.
Ana MartínezInstituto de Investigaciones en Materiales, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México DF, México.
Jesús BenzalDepartamento de Ecología Funcional y Evolutiva, Estación Experimental de Zonas Áridas, CSIC, Almería, Spain.
Miguel MotasFacultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Julia I DiazCentro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores, CCT La Plata (CONICET-UNLP), La Plata, Argentina.
Alex MiraDepartment of Genomics and Health, FISABIO Foundation, Center for Advanced Research in Public Health, Valencia, Spain.
Carlos Pedrós-AlióDepartament de Biologia Marina i Oceanografia, Institut de Ciències del Mar, CSIC, Barcelona, Spain.
Estacion Experimental de Zonas Aridas · ESInstitut de Ciències del Mar · ESCentro Científico Tecnológico - La Plata · ARFundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana · ESMuseo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales · ESUniversidad de Murcia · ESUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gastrointestinal tract microbiota is known to play very important roles in the well being of animals. It is a complex community composed by hundreds of microbial species interacting closely among them and with their host, that is, a microbial ecosystem. The development of high throughput sequencing techniques allows studying the diversity of such communities in a realistic way and considerable work has been carried out in mammals and some birds such as chickens. Wild birds have received less attention and in particular, in the case of penguins, only a few individuals of five species have been examined with molecular techniques. We collected cloacal samples from Chinstrap penguins in the Vapour Col rookery in Deception Island, Antarctica, and carried out pyrosequencing of the V1-V3 region of the 16S rDNA in samples from 53 individuals, 27 adults and 26 chicks. This provided the first description of the Chinstrap penguin gastrointestinal tract microbiota and the most extensive in any penguin species. Firmicutes, Bacteoridetes, Proteobacteria, Fusobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Tenericutes were the main components. There were large differences between chicks and adults. The former had more Firmicutes and the latter more Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria. In addition, adults had richer and more diverse bacterial communities than chicks. These differences were also observed between parents and their offspring. On the other hand, nests explained differences in bacterial communities only among chicks. We suggest that environmental factors have a higher importance than genetic factors in the microbiota composition of chicks. The results also showed surprisingly large differences in community composition with other Antarctic penguins including the congeneric Adélie and Gentoo penguins.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAnimalsDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalEcosystemGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGastrointestinal TractGenetic VariationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMetagenomeSpheniscidaeDNA, BacterialDNA, Ribosomal

Identifiers

PMID27055030
PMCPMC4824521
OpenAlexW2331572157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.