Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27054824›Full record

Trial reportJournal of consulting and clinical psychology2016

The relationship between alliance and outcome: Analysis of a two-person perspective on alliance and session outcome.

Sigal Zilcha-Mano, J Christopher Muran, Clara Hungr, Catherine F Eubanks, Jeremy D Safran, Arnold Winston

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sigal Zilcha-ManoDepartment of Psychology, University of Haifa.
J Christopher MuranDerner Institute of Advanced Psychological Studies, Adelphi University.
Clara HungrDerner Institute of Advanced Psychological Studies, Adelphi University.
Catherine F EubanksFerkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University.
Jeremy D SafranClinical Psychology Program, The New School for Social Research.
Arnold WinstonDepartment of Psychiatry, Mount Sinai Beth Israel.

Funding

Resolving Ruptures in Therapeutic AllianceR34MH071768 · NIMH · BETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CTR (NEW YORK) · PI MURAN, JOHN CHRISTOPHER · 2006 to 2008
$681k
NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH071768
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBetter alliance is known to predict better psychotherapy outcomes, but the interdependent and interactive effects of both therapist- and patient-reported alliance levels have yet to be systematically investigated.

methodUsing actor-partner interdependence model analysis the authors estimated actor, partner, and 2 types of interactive effects of alliance on session outcome in a sample of 241 patient-therapist dyads across 30 sessions of cognitive-behavioral and alliance-focused therapy.

resultsFindings suggest that the most robust predictors of session outcome are within-treatment changes in patient reports of the alliance, which predict both patient and therapist report on outcome. Within-treatment changes in therapist reports of the alliance, as well as differences between patients and between therapists in their average ratings of alliance levels across treatment, predict outcome as reported by the specific individual. Although alliance was found to be a significant predictor of outcome in both treatments, for therapist-reported alliance and outcome it had a stronger effect in alliance-focused therapy than in cognitive-behavioral therapy. Additionally, dyads with the highest pooled level of alliance from both partners fared best on session outcome.

conclusionsThe results are consistent with a 2-person perspective on psychotherapy, demonstrating the importance of considering the interdependent and interactive nature of both patient and therapist alliance levels on session outcome. (PsycINFO Database Record

Indexed as

Professional-Patient RelationsPsychotherapyAdultCognitive Behavioral TherapyCooperative BehaviorFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID27054824
PMCPMC4873423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.