Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27054719›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Screening for Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: A Survey of 420 Nephrologists.

Adrien Flahault, Denis Trystram, Marie Fouchard, Bertrand Knebelmann, François Nataf, Dominique Joly

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Polycystic kidney disease.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2018
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Adrien FlahaultUniversité Paris-Descartes; Faculté de Médecine; AP-HP; Service de Néphrologie, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Paris, France.
Denis TrystramUniversité Paris-Descartes, INSERM UMR 894, Service de Neuroradiologie, Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne, Paris, France.
Marie FouchardUniversité Paris-Descartes; Faculté de Médecine; AP-HP; Service de Néphrologie, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Paris, France.
Bertrand KnebelmannUniversité Paris-Descartes; Faculté de Médecine; AP-HP; Service de Néphrologie, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Paris, France.
François NatafUniversité Paris-Descartes, INSERM UMR 894, Service de Neurochirurgie, Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne, Paris, France.
Dominique JolyUniversité Paris-Descartes; Faculté de Médecine; AP-HP; Service de Néphrologie, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Paris, France.
Université Paris Cité · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCentre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne · FRDélégation Paris 5 · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite a high prevalence of intracranial aneurysm (ICA) in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), rupture events are rare. The current recommendations for ICA screening are based on expert opinions and studies with low levels of evidence.

objectivesThe aim of our study was to describe the attitudes of practicing nephrologists in Europe towards screening for ICA using magnetic resonance angiography (MRA).

methodsWe conducted a web-based survey among 1315 European French-speaking nephrologists and nephrology residents. An anonymous, electronic questionnaire including 24 independent questions related to ICA screening modalities, indications and participant profiles was sent by email between September and December 2014. Four hundred and twenty nephrologists (mostly from France) participated, including 31 nephrology residents; the response rate was 32%.

resultsSystematic screening for ICA was advocated by 28% of the nephrologists. A family history of ICA rupture, sudden death, stroke and migraine were consensual indications for screening (> 90% of the panel). In other clinical situations largely not covered by the recommendations (pregnancy, nephrectomy, kidney transplantation, cardiac or hepatic surgery, uncontrolled hypertension, lack of familial ADPKD history, at-risk activity, tobacco use), the attitudes towards screening were highly divergent. ICA screening was influenced by nephrologists experience with ADPKD and by their practice setting. The majority of participants (57%) would not repeat a normal ICA screening. Only a few participants (22%) knew that non-contrast MRA was the reference diagnostic tool for ICA screening, whereas most participants thought that contrast enhancement was necessary to screen for ICA. The results from the nephrology residents were analyzed separately and yielded similar results.

conclusionThis practice survey revealed that most nephrologists follow the current recommendations for the initial screening of ICAs. However, more than a quarter of the panel was in favor of systematic ICA screening, most nephrologists did not know that contrast medium was not necessary to screen for ICA using MRA, and many areas of uncertainty remain.

Indexed as

NephrologyEuropeHumansIntracranial AneurysmMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMass ScreeningPhysiciansPolycystic Kidney, Autosomal DominantPractice Guidelines as TopicPrevalenceSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID27054719
PMCPMC4824518
OpenAlexW2327428538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.