Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27054560›Full record

ArticleObesity facts2016

Obesity Management in Adolescents: Comparison of a Low-Intensity Face-to-Face Therapy Provided by a Trained Paediatrician with an Intensive Multidisciplinary Group Therapy.

Catherine Chamay-Weber, Nathalie J Farpour-Lambert, Catherine Saunders Gasser, Xavier E Martin, Claudine Gal, Albane B Maggio

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity facts, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Catherine Chamay-WeberChildren's Hospital, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Nathalie J Farpour-Lambert
Catherine Saunders Gasser
Xavier E Martin
Claudine Gal
Albane B Maggio
University Hospital of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to compare the effects of a low-intensity face-to-face therapy provided by a trained paediatrician to an intensive group therapy provided by a multidisciplinary team on the BMI of adolescents with obesity.

methodsThis longitudinal cohort study included 233 adolescents aged 11-18 years (mean 13.1 ± 1.7 years). Patients and their parents choose either a low-intensity face-to-face therapy or an intensive group therapy (total 88 h).

resultsAt baseline, the mean BMI was 29.4 ± 4.9 kg/m2. Within groups changes of BMI z-scores were significant at the end of follow-up both in the face-to-face (-0.2 ± 0.5) and the group therapy (-0.24 ± 0.5). There was no difference among groups. Younger age (12-14 years), gender, follow-up duration as well as BMI z-score at inclusion were significantly related to BMI z-score changes, independently of the type of intervention. As expected, the face-to-face therapy was far less expensive than the group therapy (USD 1,473.00 ± 816.00 vs. USD 6,473.00 ± 780.00).

conclusionA low-intensity face-to-face therapy resulted in similar changes of the BMI z-score of adolescents than an intensive multidisciplinary group therapy. This approach could be easily disseminated in primary care settings with a specific training in obesity care.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementAdolescentAge FactorsBody Mass IndexChildCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleParentsPediatric ObesityPediatricsPsychotherapy, GroupSex FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID27054560
PMCPMC5644868
OpenAlexW2328836473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.