Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27054396›Full record

ArticleHealth communication2016

Patient Involvement: A New Source of Stress in Health Care Work?

Judith E Arnetz, Ludmila Zhdanova, Bengt B Arnetz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health communication, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Protecting Personhood: A Classic Grounded Theory.Qualitative health research · 2023
    Article
  3. Evaluating Drivers of the Patient Experience Triangle: Stress, Anxiety, and Frustration.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  4. Patient Involvement in Shared Decision-Making: Do Patients Rate Physicians and Nurses Differently?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The impact of severe asthma on patients' autonomy: A qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Judith E Arnetza Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences , Wayne State University School of Medicine and Institute for Environmental Health Sciences , Detroit , Michigan , USA.
Ludmila Zhdanovac Department of Psychology , Booth University College , Winnipeg , Manitoba , Canada.
Bengt B Arnetzb Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.

Funding

Pilot Project ProgramP30ES020957 · NIEHS · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI RUNGE-MORRIS, MELISSA A · 2014 to 2021
$10.1M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES020957
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients have become increasingly well informed with higher expectations to be involved in decision-making processes regarding their care and treatment. However, few studies have examined the impact of patient involvement on health care providers' partnership-building communication. The aim of this study was to measure and explore the self-reported effects of patient involvement on the work of physicians and nurses. A questionnaire survey was distributed among cardiology staff in 12 Swedish hospitals (N = 488, response rate 67%). The sample was comprised of registered nurses (RNs, n = 303), licensed practical nurses (LPNs, n = 132), and physicians (MDs, n = 53). Confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine seven questionnaire statements concerning implications of patient involvement for one's clinical work. Regression analyses were used to examine factors associated with staff's partnership-building communication. Analysis confirmed two distinct factors accounting for 57% of the total variance, representing both negative-"Hassles"-and positive-"Uplifts"-aspects of patient involvement. Regression analyses revealed that only positive aspects (i.e., uplifts) of patient involvement predicted staff behavior aimed at involving patients. Working with actively involved patients may be a source of stress, both negative and positive, for health care professionals. By developing work routines for involving patients in their care, health care workplaces may help health care professionals to buffer the negative effects, and enhance the positive effects, of that stress.

Indexed as

Home Health NursingPatient ParticipationAdultFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleStress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesSweden

Identifiers

PMID27054396
PMCPMC5028106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.