Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27054390›Full record

ArticleActa otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale2016

Achieving early functional auditory access in paediatric cochlear implantation.

E Orzan, E Muzzi, R Marchi, C Falzone, S Battelino, E Ciciriello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

E OrzanAudiology and Otolaryngology, Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy;
E MuzziAudiology and Otolaryngology, Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy;
R MarchiAudiology and Otolaryngology, Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy;
C FalzoneAudiology and Otolaryngology, Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy;
S BattelinoUniversity Medical Centre Ljubljana, Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Slovenia;
E CicirielloAudiology and Otolaryngology, Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy;

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cochlear implantation (CI) is a viable option for providing access to auditory stimulation in severe-to-profound hearing loss/impairment of cochlear origin. It has been demonstrated that CI is safe and effective for deaf children. Younger age at activation after CI is linked with better outcomes. It is important to study variables and issues that can interfere with an early fitting and access to sound after CI. They range from patient characteristics, family compliance and support, to technical, medical or organisational problems. A SWOT analysis and a subsequent TOWS matrix was conducted to discuss issues and propose recommendations to be considered when operating an early switch on of the CI.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolCochleaCochlear ImplantsDeafnessHumansAuditory stimulation childrenCochlear implant childrenCochlear implant fittingEarly intervention children

Identifiers

PMID27054390
PMCPMC4825059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.