Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27054032›Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2016

Failure to rescue patients from early critical complications of oesophagogastric cancer surgery.

Elroy P Weledji, Vincent Verla

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Decision-making in emergency colorectal surgery for cancer.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. [Endoscopic Treatments in Perforation or Fistula in Upper Gastrointestinal Tract].The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Failure to rescue in surgical patients: A review for acute care surgeons.The journal of trauma and acute care surgery · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. The principles of the surgical management of gastric cancer.International journal of surgery. Oncology · 2017
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elroy P WeledjiDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon.
Vincent VerlaDepartment of Anaesthesia, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, Cameroon.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

'Failure to rescue' is a significant cause of mortality in gastrointestinal surgery. Differences in mortality between high and low-volume hospitals are not associated with large difference in complication rates but to the ability of the hospital to effectively rescue patients from the complications. We reviewed the critical complications following surgery for oesophageal and gastric cancer, their prevention and reasons for failure to rescue. Strategies focussing on perioperative optimization, the timely recognition and management of complications may be essential to improving outcome in low-volume hospitals.

Indexed as

CarcinomaComplicationsGastrectomyOesophagectomyRescue

Identifiers

PMID27054032
PMCPMC4802398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.