Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27053751›Full record

ReviewProceedings. Biological sciences2016

Host behaviour-parasite feedback: an essential link between animal behaviour and disease ecology.

Vanessa O Ezenwa, Elizabeth A Archie, Meggan E Craft, Dana M Hawley, Lynn B Martin, Janice Moore, Lauren White

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Relevance of state-behaviour feedbacks for animal welfare.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Proximate and ultimate causes of pregnancy sickness.Evolution, medicine, and public health · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Improving and Extending STERGM Approximations Based on Cross-Sectional Data and Tie Durations.Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vanessa O EzenwaOdum School of Ecology and Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA vezenwa@uga.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8078-1913
Elizabeth A ArchieDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.
Meggan E CraftDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA.
Dana M HawleyDepartment of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
Lynn B MartinDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA.
Janice MooreDepartment of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Lauren WhiteDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal behaviour and the ecology and evolution of parasites are inextricably linked. For this reason, animal behaviourists and disease ecologists have been interested in the intersection of their respective fields for decades. Despite this interest, most research at the behaviour-disease interface focuses either on how host behaviour affects parasites or how parasites affect behaviour, with little overlap between the two. Yet, the majority of interactions between hosts and parasites are probably reciprocal, such that host behaviour feeds back on parasites and vice versa. Explicitly considering these feedbacks is essential for understanding the complex connections between animal behaviour and parasite ecology and evolution. To illustrate this point, we discuss how host behaviour-parasite feedbacks might operate and explore the consequences of feedback for studies of animal behaviour and parasites. For example, ignoring the feedback of host social structure on parasite dynamics can limit the accuracy of predictions about parasite spread. Likewise, considering feedback in studies of parasites and animal personalities may provide unique insight about the maintenance of variation in personality types. Finally, applying the feedback concept to links between host behaviour and beneficial, rather than pathogenic, microbes may shed new light on transitions between mutualism and parasitism. More generally, accounting for host behaviour-parasite feedbacks can help identify critical gaps in our understanding of how key host behaviours and parasite traits evolve and are maintained.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalHost-Parasite InteractionsAnimalsModels, BiologicalPersonalityPopulation DynamicsSocial Behavioranimal behaviourdisease ecologyfeedbackparasite

Identifiers

PMID27053751
PMCPMC4843650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.