Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27053691›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Renal physiology2016

Differential effects of superoxide and hydrogen peroxide on myogenic signaling, membrane potential, and contractions of mouse renal afferent arterioles.

Lingli Li, En Yin Lai, Anton Wellstein, William J Welch, Christopher S Wilcox

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Renal physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Oxidative Regulation of Vascular CaAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Oxidative Stress and Hypertensive Diseases.The Medical clinics of North America · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lingli LiHypertension, Kidney and Vascular Research Center and Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia;
En Yin LaiDepartment of Physiology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China; and.
Anton WellsteinLombadi Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia.
William J WelchHypertension, Kidney and Vascular Research Center and Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia;
Christopher S WilcoxHypertension, Kidney and Vascular Research Center and Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia; wilcoxch@georgetown.edu.
Georgetown University · USZhejiang University · CN

Funding

Renal Vascular Oxidative Stress in HypertensionP01HL068686 · NHLBI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI JOSE, PEDRO A., SANDBERG, KATHRYN L · 2001 to 2017
$28.8M
Regulation of Renal Function and BP by ThromboxaneR01DK109272 · NIDDK · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI WELCH, WILLIAM J, WILCOX, CHRISTOPHER S · 2016 to 2019
$1.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL068686NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK109272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myogenic contraction is the principal component of renal autoregulation that protects the kidney from hypertensive barotrauma. Contractions are initiated by a rise in perfusion pressure that signals a reduction in membrane potential (Em) of vascular smooth muscle cells to activate voltage-operated Ca(2+) channels. Since ROS have variable effects on myogenic tone, we investigated the hypothesis that superoxide (O2 (·-)) and H2O2 differentially impact myogenic contractions. The myogenic contractions of mouse isolated and perfused single afferent arterioles were assessed from changes in luminal diameter with increasing perfusion pressure (40-80 mmHg). O2 (·-), H2O2, and Em were assessed by fluorescence microscopy during incubation with paraquat to increase O2 (·-) or with H2O2 Paraquat enhanced O2 (·-) generation and myogenic contractions (-42 ± 4% vs. -19 ± 4%, P < 0.005) that were blocked by SOD but not by catalase and signaled via PKC. In contrast, H2O2 inhibited the effects of paraquat and reduced myogenic contractions (-10 ± 1% vs. -19 ± 2%, P < 0.005) and signaled via PKG. O2 (·-) activated Ca(2+)-activated Cl(-) channels that reduced Em, whereas H2O2 activated Ca(2+)-activated and voltage-gated K(+) channels that increased Em Blockade of voltage-operated Ca(2+) channels prevented the enhanced myogenic contractions with paraquat without preventing the reduction in Em Myogenic contractions were independent of the endothelium and largely independent of nitric oxide. We conclude that O2 (·-) and H2O2 activate different signaling pathways in vascular smooth muscle cells linked to discreet membrane channels with opposite effects on Em and voltage-operated Ca(2+) channels and therefore have opposite effects on myogenic contractions.

Indexed as

AnimalsArteriolesHydrogen PeroxideMaleMembrane PotentialsMiceMuscle, Smooth, VascularParaquatReactive Oxygen SpeciesSuperoxidesVasoconstrictionHydrogen PeroxideParaquatReactive Oxygen SpeciesSuperoxideschloride channelspotassium channelsprotein kinase Cprotein kinase Greactive oxygen speciesrenal autoregulation

Identifiers

PMID27053691
PMCPMC4935773
OpenAlexW2332704172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.