Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27053676›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical microbiology2016

Dientamoeba fragilis, One of the Neglected Intestinal Protozoa.

Lynne S Garcia

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Molecular epidemiology and genotype diversity of Dientamoeba fragilis in a Czech hospital-based cohort: higher prevalence in paediatric patients and evidence of mixed G1/G2 infection in a single patient.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Parasitology · 2026
    Article
  4. ACG case reports journal · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Epidemiology and infection · 2025
    Article
  11. A prospective analysis of clinical and parasitological outcomes after treatment or a wait-and-see approach of Dientamoeba fragilis infection in an adult general practice population.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Observational
  12. A cross-sectional survey ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Microorganisms · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Lynne S GarciaLSG & Associates, Santa Monica, California, USA lynnegarcia2@verizon.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dientamoeba fragilis is a single-celled protozoan, closely related to the trichomonads. Reported worldwide as causing human gastrointestinal symptoms, D. fragilis is very common and is second only to Blastocystis spp. Dientamoebiasis equals or exceeds the incidence of giardiasis. This minireview includes diagnostic options, clinical relevance, therapy, an animal model, the confirmed cyst stage, and sequencing data. The development of a rodent model, fulfilling Koch's postulates, and the confirmation of a cyst stage have clarified transmission routes, including fecal-oral transmission. The prevalence of D. fragilis varies between 0% to over 82%; results depend on the geographic location, group studied, and diagnostic methods used.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntiprotozoal AgentsDientamoebaDientamoebiasisDisease Models, AnimalHumansIncidenceIntestinal Diseases, ParasiticNeglected DiseasesPrevalenceAntiprotozoal Agents

Identifiers

PMID27053676
PMCPMC5005499
OpenAlexW2329998189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.