Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27053668›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2016

Serological Diagnosis of Chronic Chagas Disease: Is It Time for a Change?

Alba Abras, Montserrat Gállego, Teresa Llovet, Silvia Tebar, Mercedes Herrero, Pere Berenguer, Cristina Ballart, Carmen Martí, Carmen Muñoz

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Stage-InformedMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Assessment of Alinity s ChagasLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  12. Prevalence ofEpidemiology and infection · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Laboratory diagnosis ofFrontiers in parasitology · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Alba AbrasLaboratori de Parasitologia, Departament de Microbiologia i Parasitologia Sanitàries, Facultat de Farmàcia, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Montserrat GállegoLaboratori de Parasitologia, Departament de Microbiologia i Parasitologia Sanitàries, Facultat de Farmàcia, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Teresa LlovetServei de Microbiologia, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Silvia TebarLaboratori de Parasitologia, Departament de Microbiologia i Parasitologia Sanitàries, Facultat de Farmàcia, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Mercedes HerreroServei de Microbiologia, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Pere BerenguerServei de Microbiologia, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Cristina BallartLaboratori de Parasitologia, Departament de Microbiologia i Parasitologia Sanitàries, Facultat de Farmàcia, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Carmen MartíUnitat de Microbiologia, Hospital General de Granollers, Granollers, Spain.
Carmen MuñozServei de Microbiologia, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain cmunoz@santpau.cat.
Hospital de Sant Pau · ESBarcelona Institute for Global Health · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ESHospital General de Granollers · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chagas disease has spread to areas that are nonendemic for the disease with human migration. Since no single reference standard test is available, serological diagnosis of chronic Chagas disease requires at least two tests. New-generation techniques have significantly improved the accuracy of Chagas disease diagnosis by the use of a large mixture of recombinant antigens with different detection systems, such as chemiluminescence. The aim of the present study was to assess the overall accuracy of a new-generation kit, the Architect Chagas (cutoff, ≥1 sample relative light units/cutoff value [S/CO]), as a single technique for the diagnosis of chronic Chagas disease. The Architect Chagas showed a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 99.5 to 100%) and a specificity of 97.6% (95% CI, 95.2 to 99.9%). Five out of six false-positive serum samples were a consequence of cross-reactivity with Leishmania spp., and all of them achieved results of <5 S/CO. We propose the Architect Chagas as a single technique for screening in blood banks and for routine diagnosis in clinical laboratories. Only gray-zone and positive sera with a result of ≤6 S/CO would need to be confirmed by a second serological assay, thus avoiding false-positive sera and the problem of cross-reactivity with Leishmania species. The application of this proposal would result in important savings in the cost of Chagas disease diagnosis and therefore in the management and control of the disease.

Indexed as

Reagent Kits, DiagnosticAdultChagas DiseaseChronic DiseaseCross ReactionsFalse Positive ReactionsHumansLeishmaniaSensitivity and SpecificitySerologic TestsTime FactorsReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID27053668
PMCPMC4879299
OpenAlexW2327827971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.