Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27053222›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2018

Exploring the expectation-actuality discrepancy: a systematic review of the impact of preoperative expectations on satisfaction and patient reported outcomes in spinal surgery.

Christopher D Witiw, Alireza Mansouri, Francois Mathieu, Farshad Nassiri, Jetan H Badhiwala, Richard G Fessler

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Patient expectations for management of chronic non-cancer pain: A systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Patients' experience on waiting for spinal arthrodesis: a qualitative study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Comparison of Lumbar Fusion Surgical Outcomes Between Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis ≥80 Versus 65-79 Years Old.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Psychomotor Predictive Processing.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. What level of symptoms are patients with adult spinal deformity prepared to live with? A cross-sectional analysis of the 12-month follow-up data from 1043 patients.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Christopher D WitiwDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Alireza MansouriDepartment of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Francois MathieuDepartment of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Farshad NassiriDepartment of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jetan H BadhiwalaDepartment of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Richard G FesslerDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA. rfessler@rush.edu.
University of Toronto · CARush University Medical Center · US

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research MFE-140915
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quality in healthcare is increasingly graded through a patient-centric lens, using reports of satisfaction and self-perceived outcome. Preestablished expectations have been recognized to influence these measures. With this review, we aim to examine the impact of expectations on satisfaction and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) for individuals undergoing elective spine surgery. We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library electronic databases from inception to July 2015 for studies examining the relationship between expectations and satisfaction/PROs in the context of elective spinal surgery. Qualitative synthesis centered around three key questions: (1) Does the magnitude of preoperative expectations impact patient satisfaction and/or PRO after surgery? (2) Does the underlying spinal pathology influence this relationship? (3) What is the impact of unmet expectations on satisfaction? A total of 1489 citations were retrieved. Nineteen met our inclusion criteria. These comprised 3383 patients; 3200 had lumbar and only 183 had cervical spine surgery. Three findings prevailed: (1) high preoperative expectations appear to be associated with higher satisfaction and PROs after surgery for focal lumbar disc herniation, but not for lumbar spinal stenosis; (2) patient expectations frequently exceed actual outcome, creating an "expectation-actuality discrepancy" (E-AD); and (3) high-quality studies suggest a larger E-AD portends lower satisfaction. Limitations to the data include heterogeneous study populations and surgical indications, along with the use of non-validated assessment tools, particularly for satisfaction. Our findings highlight the potential importance of establishing realistic expectations prior to surgery and may serve to direct future research efforts.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresPatient SatisfactionHumansNeurosurgical ProceduresSpinal DiseasesSpineExpectationsPatient reported outcomesSatisfactionSpine surgery

Identifiers

PMID27053222
OpenAlexW2320095458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.