ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2016
An empirical study of a hybrid imbalanced-class DT-RST classification procedure to elucidate therapeutic effects in uremia patients.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Strategies for Class-Imbalanced Learning in Multi-Sensor Medical Imaging.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The high prevalence and incidence of severe renal diseases exhaust constrained medical resources for the treatment of uremia patients. In addition, the problem of imbalanced-class data distributions induces negative effects on classifier learning algorithms. Hemodialysis is the most common treatment for uremia diseases due to the limited supply of donated organs available for transplantation. This study focused on assessing the adequacy of hemodialysis. The lack of available information represents the primary obstacle limiting the evaluation of adequacy, namely: (1) the imbalanced-class problem in a given dataset, (2) obeying mathematical distributions for a given dataset, (3) a lack of effective methods for identifying determinant attributes, and (4) developing effective decision rules to explain a given dataset. To address these issues for determining the therapeutic effects of hemodialysis in uremia patients, this study proposes a hybrid imbalanced-class decision tree-rough set model to integrate the knowledge of expert physicians, a feature selection method, imbalanced sampling techniques, a rough set classifier, and a rule filter. The method was assessed by examining the medical records of uremia patients from a medical center in Taiwan. The proposed method yields better performance compared to previously reported methods according to the evaluation criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.