Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27053133›Full record

ReviewDisease models & mechanisms2016

Using Drosophila to discover mechanisms underlying type 2 diabetes.

Ronald W Alfa, Seung K Kim

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Disease models & mechanisms, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Roles of abioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Journal of traditional and complementary medicine · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Inositol in Disease and Development: Roles of Catabolism viaInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Regular Exercise inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ronald W AlfaDepartment of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA Neuroscience Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA rwalfa@stanford.edu seungkim@stanford.edu.
Seung K KimDepartment of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA Department of Medicine (Oncology), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA rwalfa@stanford.edu seungkim@stanford.edu.
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · USStanford University · US

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanisms of glucose homeostasis are remarkably well conserved between the fruit flyDrosophila melanogasterand mammals. From the initial characterization of insulin signaling in the fly came the identification of downstream metabolic pathways for nutrient storage and utilization. Defects in these pathways lead to phenotypes that are analogous to diabetic states in mammals. These discoveries have stimulated interest in leveraging the fly to better understand the genetics of type 2 diabetes mellitus in humans. Type 2 diabetes results from insulin insufficiency in the context of ongoing insulin resistance. Although genetic susceptibility is thought to govern the propensity of individuals to develop type 2 diabetes mellitus under appropriate environmental conditions, many of the human genes associated with the disease in genome-wide association studies have not been functionally studied. Recent advances in the phenotyping of metabolic defects have positionedDrosophilaas an excellent model for the functional characterization of large numbers of genes associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Here, we examine results from studies modeling metabolic disease in the fruit fly and compare findings to proposed mechanisms for diabetic phenotypes in mammals. We provide a systematic framework for assessing the contribution of gene candidates to insulin-secretion or insulin-resistance pathways relevant to diabetes pathogenesis.

Indexed as

AnimalsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Drosophila melanogasterGlucoseHomeostasisInsulinSignal TransductionGlucoseInsulinDiabetesDrosophilaInsulin-like peptidesInsulin resistance

Identifiers

PMID27053133
PMCPMC4852505
OpenAlexW2335651339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.