Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27052795›Full record

ArticleClinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))2016

Biological Features of Human Papillomavirus-related Head and Neck Cancers Contributing to Improved Response.

C Cleary, J E Leeman, D S Higginson, N Katabi, E Sherman, L Morris, S McBride, N Lee, N Riaz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Head and neck tumor cells treated with hypofractionated irradiation die via apoptosis and are better taken up by M1-like macrophages.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

C ClearyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
J E LeemanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
D S HigginsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
N KatabiDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
E ShermanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
L MorrisDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
S McBrideDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
N LeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: leen2@mskcc.org.
N RiazDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: riazn@mskcc.org.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) are the sixth most common malignancy globally, and an increasing proportion of oropharyngeal HNSCCs are associated with the human papillomavirus (HPV). Patients with HPV-associated tumours have markedly improved overall and disease-specific survival compared with their HPV-negative counterparts when treated with chemoradiation. Although the difference in outcomes between these two groups is clearly established, the mechanism underlying these differences remains an area of investigation. Data from preclinical, clinical and genomics studies have started to suggest that an increase in radio-sensitivity of HPV-positive HNSCC may be responsible for improved outcomes, the putative mechanisms of which we will review here. The Cancer Genome Atlas and others have recently documented a multitude of molecular differences between HPV-positive and HPV-negative tumours. Preclinical investigations by multiple groups have explored possible mechanisms of increased sensitivity to therapy, including examining differences in DNA repair, hypoxia and the immune response. In addition to differences in the response to therapy, some groups have started to investigate phenotypic differences between the two diseases, such as tumour invasiveness. Finally, we will conclude with a brief review of ongoing clinical trials that are attempting to de-escalate treatment to minimise long-term toxicity while maintaining cure rates. New insights from preclinical and genomic studies may eventually lead to personalised treatment paradigms for HPV-positive patients.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsBiologyDNA repairhead and neck cancerHPVradiosensitivity

Identifiers

PMID27052795
PMCPMC5512583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.