Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27052789›Full record

ReviewGenome biology2016

4D nucleomes in single cells: what can computational modeling reveal about spatial chromatin conformation?

Monika Sekelja, Jonas Paulsen, Philippe Collas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genome biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Advancements and future directions in single-cell Hi-C based 3D chromatin modeling.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  5. Dynamics of chromosome organization in a minimal bacterial cell.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Integrating ChIP-seq with other functional genomics data.Briefings in functional genomics · 2018
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Monika SekeljaDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, PO Box 1112, Blindern, 0317, Oslo, Norway.
Jonas PaulsenDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, PO Box 1112, Blindern, 0317, Oslo, Norway.
Philippe CollasDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, PO Box 1112, Blindern, 0317, Oslo, Norway. philc@medisin.uio.no.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-wide sequencing technologies enable investigations of the structural properties of the genome in various spatial dimensions. Here, we review computational techniques developed to model the three-dimensional genome in single cells versus ensembles of cells and assess their underlying assumptions. We further address approaches to study the spatio-temporal aspects of genome organization from single-cell data.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputational BiologyModels, MolecularNucleic Acid ConformationNucleosomesSingle-Cell AnalysisSpatial AnalysisNucleosomes

Identifiers

PMID27052789
PMCPMC4823877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.