Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27052659›Full record

Observational studyBMC health services research2016

Resource allocation and the burden of co-morbidities among patients diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: an observational cohort study from Danish general practice.

Peder Ahnfeldt-Mollerup, Jesper Lykkegaard, Anders Halling, Kim Rose Olsen, Troels Kristensen

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and comorbidities: a large cross-sectional study in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Peder Ahnfeldt-MollerupResearch Unit of General Practice, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, JB Winsløws Vej 9A, DK-5000, Odense C, Denmark. pahnfeldt-mollerup@health.sdu.dk.
Jesper LykkegaardResearch Unit of General Practice, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, JB Winsløws Vej 9A, DK-5000, Odense C, Denmark.
Anders HallingResearch Unit of General Practice, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, JB Winsløws Vej 9A, DK-5000, Odense C, Denmark.
Kim Rose OlsenResearch Unit of General Practice, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, JB Winsløws Vej 9A, DK-5000, Odense C, Denmark.
Troels KristensenResearch Unit of General Practice, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, JB Winsløws Vej 9A, DK-5000, Odense C, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a leading cause of mortality, and associated with increased healthcare utilization and healthcare expenditure. In several countries, morbidity-based systems have changed the way resources are allocated in general practice. In primary care, fee-for-services tariffs are often based on political negotiation rather than costing systems. The potential for comprehensive measures of patient morbidity to explain variation in negotiated expenditures for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease has not previously been examined. The aim of this study is to analyze fee-for-service expenditure of patients diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease visiting Danish general practice clinics and further to assess what proportion of fee-for-service expenditure variation was explained by patient morbidity and general practice clinic characteristics, respectively.

methodsWe used patient morbidity characteristics such as diagnostic markers and multi-morbidity adjustment based on adjusted clinical groups (ACGs) and fee-for-service expenditure for a sample of primary care patients for the year 2010. Our sample included 3,973 patients in 59 general practices. We used a multi-level approach.

resultsThe average annual fee-for-service expenditure of caring for patients diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in general practice was about EUR 400 per patient. Variation in the expenditures was driven by multimorbidity characteristics up to 28% where as characteristics such as age and gender only explained 5%. Expenditures increased progressively with the degree of multimorbidity. In addition, expenditures were higher for patients who had diagnostic markers based on ICPC-2 (body systems and/or components such as infections and symptoms). Nevertheless, 9.8-15.4% of the variation in expenditure was related to the clinic in which the patient was cared for.

conclusionPatient morbidity and general practice clinic characteristics are significant patient-related fee-for-service expenditure drivers in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease care.

Indexed as

Fee-for-Service PlansGeneral PracticeAgedCohort StudiesComorbidityDenmarkFemaleHealth ExpendituresHumansMaleMiddle AgedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveResource Allocation

Identifiers

PMID27052659
PMCPMC4823839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.