Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27052569›Full record

ArticleGenetics2016

Likelihood-Free Inference in High-Dimensional Models.

Athanasios Kousathanas, Christoph Leuenberger, Jonas Helfer, Mathieu Quinodoz, Matthieu Foll, Daniel Wegmann

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 100% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Population-genomic inference of the strength and timing of selection against gene flow.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Athanasios KousathanasDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Fribourg, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland.
Christoph LeuenbergerDepartment of Mathematics, University of Fribourg, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland.
Jonas HelferElectrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge Massachusetts 02139.
Mathieu QuinodozDepartment of Computational Biology, University of Lausanne, 1200 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Matthieu FollInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, 69372 Lyon, France.
Daniel WegmannDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Fribourg, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland daniel.wegmann@unifr.ch.
SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CHCentre International de Recherche sur le Cancer · FRMassachusetts Institute of Technology · USUniversity of Fribourg · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methods that bypass analytical evaluations of the likelihood function have become an indispensable tool for statistical inference in many fields of science. These so-called likelihood-free methods rely on accepting and rejecting simulations based on summary statistics, which limits them to low-dimensional models for which the value of the likelihood is large enough to result in manageable acceptance rates. To get around these issues, we introduce a novel, likelihood-free Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method combining two key innovations: updating only one parameter per iteration and accepting or rejecting this update based on subsets of statistics approximately sufficient for this parameter. This increases acceptance rates dramatically, rendering this approach suitable even for models of very high dimensionality. We further derive that for linear models, a one-dimensional combination of statistics per parameter is sufficient and can be found empirically with simulations. Finally, we demonstrate that our method readily scales to models of very high dimensionality, using toy models as well as by jointly inferring the effective population size, the distribution of fitness effects (DFE) of segregating mutations, and selection coefficients for each locus from data of a recent experiment on the evolution of drug resistance in influenza.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticDrug Resistance, ViralGenetic FitnessGenetic LociMutationOrthomyxoviridaeProbabilitySelection, Geneticapproximate Bayesian computationdistribution of fitness effectshierarchical modelshigh dimensionsMarkov chain Monte Carlo

Identifiers

PMID27052569
PMCPMC4896201
OpenAlexW1679970377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.