Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27052549›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2016

Comparison of old (75-79 years) to very old (80+ years) hospitalized otorhinolaryngology patients.

Inga Weißenborn, Julia Ritter, Katharina Geißler, Orlando Guntinas-Lichius

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. The admission patterns of octogenerians nonagenerians and centenarians to the Department of Otoloaryngology.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Inga WeißenbornDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Jena University Hospital, Lessingstrasse 2, 07740, Jena, Germany.
Julia RitterDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Jena University Hospital, Lessingstrasse 2, 07740, Jena, Germany.
Katharina GeißlerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Jena University Hospital, Lessingstrasse 2, 07740, Jena, Germany.
Orlando Guntinas-LichiusDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Jena University Hospital, Lessingstrasse 2, 07740, Jena, Germany. orlando.guntinas@med.uni-jena.de.
Jena University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim was to determine the patients' characteristics, comorbidity, and inpatient treatment features of very old otorhinolaryngology patients (80+ years) compared to old patients (75-79 years).

methodsA single-center cohort study in a tertiary and university care center was performed with 144 old and 143 very old patients who were hospitalized in 2012. Predictors for differences between old and very old patients were analyzed univariately and multivariately using regression models.

resultsEar (30 %) and nose/paranasal sinus (23 %) diseases were the most frequent reasons for hospitalization. Baseline and disease characteristics were not different between the two groups of elderly patients. Duration of hospitalization was no longer in very old patients (p = 0.827). Mobility (p = 0.017), dietary intake (p = 0.017), and having hearing aid (p < 0.0001) were independent comorbidity predictors in very old patients compared to old patients. Polymedication was found less frequently in very old patients (p = 0.017). To take cardiovascular drugs (p = 0.009) or psychotherapeutic drugs (p = 0.045) were independent permanent medication predictors in very old patients compared to old patients. About half of the patients received a surgical treatment (52 %) and the other half a conservative treatment (48 %). The very old patients received significantly more often an antibiotic treatment (p < 0.0001). Complication rates for surgical cases and non-surgical cases were not different (p = 0.686 and p = 0.524, respectively).

conclusionsAlthough comorbidity continues to increase in hospitalized very old compared to old otorhinolaryngology patients, most of the disease, treatment and treatment related complication characteristics seem not to change significantly from old to very old patients.

Indexed as

Geriatric AssessmentAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGermanyHospitalizationHumansInpatientsMaleMorbidityOtorhinolaryngologic DiseasesRisk FactorsElderlyGeriatric otorhinolaryngologyHospitalizationInpatient treatmentOlder adults

Identifiers

PMID27052549
OpenAlexW2324181944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.