Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27051559›Full record

ArticleScientifica2016

Comparison of Antimicrobial Activity of Chlorhexidine, Coconut Oil, Probiotics, and Ketoconazole on Candida albicans Isolated in Children with Early Childhood Caries: An In Vitro Study.

Beena Shino, Faizal C Peedikayil, Shyamala R Jaiprakash, Gufran Ahmed Bijapur, Soni Kottayi, Deepak Jose

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientifica, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Dose-Dependent Inhibitory Effect of ProbioticPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Local Ugandan Production of Stable 0.2% Chlorhexidine Eye Drops.Translational vision science & technology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Inhibitory Effect ofOxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Beena ShinoDepartment of Pedodontics, Kannur Dental College, Kerala 670612, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9040-3449
Faizal C PeedikayilDepartment of Pedodontics, Kannur Dental College, Kerala 670612, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3821-7809
Shyamala R JaiprakashDepartment of Microbiology, Kannur Medical College, Kerala 670612, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2831-0441
Gufran Ahmed BijapurDepartment of Microbiology, Kannur Medical College, Kerala 670612, India.
Soni KottayiDepartment of Pedodontics, Kannur Dental College, Kerala 670612, India.
Deepak JoseDepartment of Pedodontics, Kannur Dental College, Kerala 670612, India.
Kannur Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background. Early childhood caries (ECC) is associated with early colonisation and high levels of cariogenic microorganisms. With C. albicans being one of those, there is a need to determine the effectiveness of various chemotherapeutic agents against it. The study is aimed at isolating Candida species in children with ECC and at studying the antifungal effect of coconut oil, probiotics, Lactobacillus, and 0.2% chlorhexidine on C. albicans in comparison with ketoconazole. Materials and Methods. Samples were collected using sterile cotton swabs, swabbed on the tooth surfaces from children with ECC of 3 to 6 yrs and streaked on Sabouraud dextrose agar (HI Media) plates and incubated in a 5% CO2 enriched atmosphere at 37°C for 24 hours. Candida was isolated and its susceptibility to probiotics, chlorhexidine, ketoconazole, and coconut oil was determined using Disc Diffusion method. Results. The mean zone of inhibition for chlorhexidine was 21.8 mm, whereas for coconut oil it was 16.8 mm, for probiotics it was 13.5 mm, and for ketoconazole it was 22.3 mm. The difference between the groups was not statistically significant (Chi-square value 7.42, P value 0.06). Conclusion. Chlorhexidine and coconut oil have shown significant antifungal activity which is comparable with ketoconazole.

Identifiers

PMID27051559
PMCPMC4808662
OpenAlexW2297497393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.