ArticleEmergency medicine international2016
Paramedic Recognition of Sepsis in the Prehospital Setting: A Prospective Observational Study.
Article in Emergency medicine international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early Identification of Sepsis by Emergency Medical Services: Diagnostic Accuracy of Scoring Systems in a Retrospective Cohort.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Protocol for a multicenter, cluster-randomized, stepped-wedge, implementation trial of a prehospital sepsis protocol.Trials · 2025Article
- Diagnostic agreement between emergency medical service and emergency department physicians, a prospective multicentre study.BMC emergency medicine · 2024Observational
- Looking back to inform the future: a review of published paramedicine research.BMC health services research · 2023Review
- Pre-hospital triage performance and emergency medical services nurse's field assessment in an unselected patient population attended to by the emergency medical services: a prospective observational study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2020Observational
- The accuracy of preliminary diagnoses made by paramedics - a cross-sectional comparative study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2020Article
- Screening strategies to identify sepsis in the prehospital setting: a validation study.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2020Article
- Prehospital characteristics among patients with sepsis: a comparison between patients with or without adverse outcome.BMC emergency medicine · 2019Observational
- The final assessment and its association with field assessment in patients who were transported by the emergency medical service.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2018Article
- Prehospital Care and Emergency Department Door-to-Antibiotic Time in Sepsis.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2018Article
- Characterization of Children with Septic Shock Cared for by Emergency Medical Services.Prehospital emergency careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background. Patients with sepsis benefit from early diagnosis and treatment. Accurate paramedic recognition of sepsis is important to initiate care promptly for patients who arrive by Emergency Medical Services. Methods. Prospective observational study of adult patients (age ≥ 16 years) transported by paramedics to the emergency department (ED) of a Canadian tertiary hospital. Paramedic identification of sepsis was assessed using a novel prehospital sepsis screening tool developed by the study team and compared to blind, independent documentation of ED diagnoses by attending emergency physicians (EPs). Specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive value, and likelihood ratios were calculated with 95% confidence intervals. Results. Overall, 629 patients were included in the analysis. Sepsis was identified by paramedics in 170 (27.0%) patients and by EPs in 71 (11.3%) patients. Sensitivity of paramedic sepsis identification compared to EP diagnosis was 73.2% (95% CI 61.4-83.0), while specificity was 78.8% (95% CI 75.2-82.2). The accuracy of paramedic identification of sepsis was 78.2% (492/629, 52 true positive, 440 true negative). Positive and negative predictive values were 30.6% (95% CI 23.8-38.1) and 95.9% (95% CI 93.6-97.5), respectively. Conclusion. Using a novel prehospital sepsis screening tool, paramedic recognition of sepsis had greater specificity than sensitivity with reasonable accuracy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.